Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27688620›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2016

Developmental Defects Mediated by the P1/HC-Pro Potyviral Silencing Suppressor Are Not Due to Misregulation of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 8.

Sizolwenkosi Mlotshwa, Gail J Pruss, John L MacArthur, Jason W Reed, Vicki Vance

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sizolwenkosi MlotshwaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 (S.M., G.J.P., J.L.M., V.V.); and.ORCID 0000-0002-2973-2489
Gail J PrussDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 (S.M., G.J.P., J.L.M., V.V.); and.
John L MacArthurDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 (S.M., G.J.P., J.L.M., V.V.); and.
Jason W ReedDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 (S.M., G.J.P., J.L.M., V.V.); and.ORCID 0000-0001-7508-9714
Vicki VanceDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 (S.M., G.J.P., J.L.M., V.V.); and vance@biol.sc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant viral suppressors of RNA silencing induce developmental defects similar to those caused by mutations in genes involved in the microRNA pathway. A recent report has attributed viral suppressor-mediated developmental defects to up-regulation of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 8 (ARF8), a target of miR167. The key piece of evidence was that the developmental defects in transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) expressing viral suppressors were greatly alleviated in the F1 progeny of a cross with plants carrying the arf8-6 mutation. Arf8-6 is a SALK line T-DNA insertion mutant, a class of mutations prone to inducing transcriptional silencing of transgenes expressed from the 35S promoter. We have reinvestigated the role of ARF8 in viral suppressor-mediated developmental defects, using two independent arf8 mutations and the P1/HC-Pro potyviral suppressor of silencing. Progeny of a cross between P1/HC-Pro transgenic Arabidopsis and the arf8-6 T-DNA insertion mutant showed little effect on the P1/HC-Pro phenotype in the F1 generation, but almost all arf8-6/P1/HC-Pro progeny had lost the phenotype in the F2 generation. However, the loss of phenotype in the F2 generation was not correlated with the number of functional copies of the ARF8 gene. Instead, it reflected transcriptional silencing of the P1/HC-Pro transgene, as evidenced by a pronounced decrease in P1/HC-Pro mRNA and the appearance of 35S promoter small interfering RNAs. Furthermore, an independent loss-of-function point mutation, Arf8-8, had no detectable effects on P1/HC-Pro phenotype in either the F1 or F2 generations. Together, these data argue against the previously reported role of increased ARF8 expression in developmental defects caused by P1/HC-Pro.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, SuppressorRNA InterferenceArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCrosses, GeneticCysteine EndopeptidasesDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsMutagenesis, InsertionalPhenotypePoint MutationPotyvirusPromoter Regions, GeneticViral ProteinsArabidopsis Proteinsauxin response factor 8, ArabidopsisCysteine EndopeptidasesDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsHC-Pro protein, potyvirusT-DNAViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27688620
PMCPMC5100759
OpenAlexW2547172381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.