Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27688597›Full record

ArticleNeurocomputing2016

Dictionary Pruning with Visual Word Significance for Medical Image Retrieval.

Fan Zhang, Yang Song, Weidong Cai, Alexander G Hauptmann, Sidong Liu, Sonia Pujol, Ron Kikinis, Michael J Fulham, David Dagan Feng, Mei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocomputing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fan ZhangSchool of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Australia; Dept of Radiology, Brigham & Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Yang SongSchool of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Australia.
Weidong CaiSchool of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Australia.
Alexander G HauptmannSchool of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, United States.
Sidong LiuSchool of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Australia.
Sonia PujolDept of Radiology, Brigham & Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Ron KikinisDept of Radiology, Brigham & Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Michael J FulhamDept of PET and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Australia.
David Dagan FengSchool of Information Technologies, University of Sydney, Australia; Med-X Research Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University, China.
Mei ChenDept of Informatics, University of Albany State University of New York, United States; Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, United States.

Funding

Washington University ConsoritumU54EB005149 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIKINIS, RON · 2004 to 2013
$39.3M
Training and DisseminationP41EB015902 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIKINIS, RON, WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015902NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB005149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Content-based medical image retrieval (CBMIR) is an active research area for disease diagnosis and treatment but it can be problematic given the small visual variations between anatomical structures. We propose a retrieval method based on a bag-of-visual-words (BoVW) to identify discriminative characteristics between different medical images with Pruned Dictionary based on Latent Semantic Topic description. We refer to this as the PD-LST retrieval. Our method has two main components. First, we calculate a topic-word significance value for each visual word given a certain latent topic to evaluate how the word is connected to this latent topic. The latent topics are learnt, based on the relationship between the images and words, and are employed to bridge the gap between low-level visual features and high-level semantics. These latent topics describe the images and words semantically and can thus facilitate more meaningful comparisons between the words. Second, we compute an overall-word significance value to evaluate the significance of a visual word within the entire dictionary. We designed an iterative ranking method to measure overall-word significance by considering the relationship between all latent topics and words. The words with higher values are considered meaningful with more significant discriminative power in differentiating medical images. We evaluated our method on two public medical imaging datasets and it showed improved retrieval accuracy and efficiency.

Indexed as

BoVWDictionary pruningMedical image retrieval

Identifiers

PMID27688597
PMCPMC5036942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.