Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27688028›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2016

Early-stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the pig: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

Ursula Reiter, Gert Reiter, Martin Manninger, Gabriel Adelsmayr, Julia Schipke, Alessio Alogna, Alexandra Rajces, Aurelien F Stalder, Andreas Greiser, Christian Mühlfeld and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Sexual dimorphism in animal models of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ursula ReiterDivision of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9/P, 8036, Graz, Austria. ursula.reiter@medunigraz.at.
Gert ReiterSiemens Healthcare, Graz, Austria.
Martin ManningerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gabriel AdelsmayrDivision of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9/P, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Julia SchipkeHannover Medical School, Institute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover, Germany.
Alessio AlognaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Alexandra RajcesHannover Medical School, Institute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover, Germany.
Aurelien F StalderSiemens Healthcare GmBH, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas GreiserSiemens Healthcare GmBH, Erlangen, Germany.
Christian MühlfeldHannover Medical School, Institute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover, Germany.
Daniel ScherrDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Heiner PostDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Burkert PieskeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Michael FuchsjägerDivision of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9/P, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Graz · ATMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DESiemens Healthcare (Germany) · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DESiemens (Austria) · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hypertensive deoxy-corticosterone acetate (DOCA)-salt-treated pig (hereafter, DOCA pig) was recently introduced as large animal model for early-stage heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The aim of the present study was to evaluate cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) of DOCA pigs and weight-matched control pigs to characterize ventricular, atrial and myocardial structure and function of this phenotype model.

methodsFive anesthetized DOCA and seven control pigs underwent 3 T CMR at rest and during dobutamine stress. Left ventricular/atrial (LV/LA) function and myocardial mass (LVMM), strains and torsion were evaluated from (tagged) cine imaging. 4D phase-contrast measurements were used to assess blood flow and peak velocities, including transmitral early-diastolic (E) and myocardial tissue (E') velocities and coronary sinus blood flow. Myocardial perfusion reserve was estimated from stress-to-rest time-averaged coronary sinus flow. Global native myocardial T1 times were derived from prototype modified Look-Locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) short-axis T1 maps. After in-vivo measurements, transmural biopsies were collected for stereological evaluation including the volume fractions of interstitium (V

resultsIn DOCA pigs LVMM (p < 0.001) and LV wall-thickness (end-systole/end-diastole, p = 0.003/p = 0.007) were elevated. During stress, increase of LV ejection-fraction and decrease of end-systolic volume accounted for normal contractility reserves in DOCA and control pigs. Rest-to-stress differences of cardiac index (p = 0.040) and end-diastolic volume (p = 0.042) were documented. Maximal (p = 0.042) and minimal (p = 0.012) LA volumes in DOCA pigs were elevated at rest; total LA ejection-fraction decreased during stress (p = 0.006). E' was lower in DOCA pigs, corresponding to higher E/E' at rest (p = 0.013) and stress (p = 0.026). Myocardial perfusion reserve was reduced in DOCA pigs (p = 0.031). T1-times and V

conclusionsLA enlargement, E' and E/E' were the markers that showed the most pronounced differences between DOCA and control pigs at rest. Inadequate increase of myocardial perfusion reserve during stress might represent a metrics for early-stage HFpEF. Myocardial T1 mapping could not detect elevated levels of myocardial collagen in this model.

trial registrationThe study was approved by the local Bioethics Committee of Vienna, Austria (BMWF-66.010/0091-II/3b/2013).

Indexed as

Cardiovascular magnetic resonanceDiastolic dysfunctionDobutamine stressHeart failure with preserved ejection fractionPorcine model

Identifiers

PMID27688028
PMCPMC5043627
OpenAlexW2524769263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.