ArticleHealthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2017
Determinants of success in Shared Savings Programs: An analysis of ACO and market characteristics.
Article in Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between physician-hospital integration and inpatient care delivery in accountable care organizations: An instrumental variable analysis.Health services research · 2024Article
- Practice Site Heterogeneity within and between Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- How Can a Bundled Payment Model Incentivize the Transition from Single-Disease Management to Person-Centred and Integrated Care for Chronic Diseases in the Netherlands?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Treatment Patterns and Characteristics of Dialysis Facilities Randomly Assigned to the Medicare End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choices Model.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Organizational Characteristics Associated with High Performance in Medicare's Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care Initiative.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2021Article
- Association of Patient Outcomes With Bundled Payments Among Hospitalized Patients Attributed to Accountable Care Organizations.JAMA health forum · 2021Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of Value-Based Care Models in New Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations in Massachusetts: A Study Protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- How can Saudi Arabia reform its public hospital payment models? A narrative review.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020Review
- Association between specialist compensation and Accountable Care Organization performance.Health services research · 2020Article
- Medicare Shared Savings Programs: Higher Cost Accountable Care Organizations are More Likely to Achieve Savings.International journal of healthcare management · 2020Article
- ACO Contracts With Downside Financial Risk Growing, But Still In The Minority.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2019Article
- Care Transformation Strategies and Approaches of Accountable Care Organizations.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2019Article
- Medicare Accountable Care Organizations of Diverse Structures Achieve Comparable Quality and Cost Performance.Health services research · 2018Article
- Explaining Sluggish Savings under Accountable Care.The New England journal of medicine · 2017Article
- Moving Forward With Accountable Care Organizations: Some Answers, More Questions.JAMA internal medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedicare's Accountable Care Organization (ACO) programs introduced shared savings to traditional Medicare, which allow providers who reduce health care costs for their patients to retain a percentage of the savings they generate.
objectiveTo examine ACO and market factors associated with superior financial performance in Medicare ACO programs.
methodsWe obtained financial performance data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS); we derived market-level characteristics from Medicare claims; and we collected ACO characteristics from the National Survey of ACOs for 215 ACOs. We examined the association between ACO financial performance and ACO provider composition, leadership structure, beneficiary characteristics, risk bearing experience, quality and process improvement capabilities, physician performance management, market competition, CMS-assigned financial benchmark, and ACO contract start date. We examined two outcomes from Medicare ACOs' first performance year: savings per Medicare beneficiary and earning shared savings payments (a dichotomous variable).
resultsWhen modeling the ACO ability to save and earn shared savings payments, we estimated positive regression coefficients for a greater proportion of primary care providers in the ACO, more practicing physicians on the governing board, physician leadership, active engagement in reducing hospital re-admissions, a greater proportion of disabled Medicare beneficiaries assigned to the ACO, financial incentives offered to physicians, a larger financial benchmark, and greater ACO market penetration. No characteristic of organizational structure was significantly associated with both outcomes of savings per beneficiary and likelihood of achieving shared savings. ACO prior experience with risk-bearing contracts was positively correlated with savings and significantly increased the likelihood of receiving shared savings payments.
conclusionsIn the first year, performance is quite heterogeneous, yet organizational structure does not consistently predict performance. Organizations with large financial benchmarks at baseline have greater opportunities to achieve savings. Findings on prior risk bearing suggest that ACOs learn over time under risk-bearing contracts. IMPLICATIONS: Given the lack of predictive power for organizational characteristics, CMS should continue to encourage diversity in organizational structures for ACO participants, and provide alternative funding and risk bearing mechanisms to continue to allow a diverse group of organizations to participate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.