ArticleEuropean journal of public health2017
Current state of genomic policies in healthcare among EU member states: results of a survey of chief medical officers.
Article in European journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pioneering the implementation of a precision oncology strategy in Portugal: the Precision Oncology Platform trial.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
- Public attitudes, knowledge and educational needs toward genetic testing and omics sciences: a pilot survey conducted in Italy.European journal of public health · 2024Article
- Advancing Precision Medicine in South Tyrol, Italy: A Public Health Development Proposal for a Bilingual, Autonomous Province.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Genetic testing users in Italy and Germany: Health orientation, health-related habits, and psychological profile.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022Article
- Precision Medicine and Public Health: New Challenges for Effective and Sustainable Health.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Italian public's views on sharing genetic information and medical information: findings from the 'Your DNA, Your Say' study.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- Capacity Building of Health Professionals on Genetics and Genomics Practice: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Distance Learning Training Course for Italian Physicians.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genomics knowledge and attitudes among European public health professionals: Results of a cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2020Article
- Proposal for an Alliance Between Healthcare and Legal Area Professionals for Shared Public Health and Preventive Strategies in Italy and Europe.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Article
- Healthcare System Priorities for Successful Integration of Genomics: An Australian Focus.Frontiers in public health · 2019Review
- Current landscape of personalized medicine adoption and implementation in Southeast Asia.BMC medical genomics · 2018Article
- Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Article
- The Evolution of Public Health Genomics: Exploring Its Past, Present, and Future.Frontiers in public health · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A need for a governance of genomics in healthcare among European Union (EU) countries arose during an international meeting of experts on public health genomics (PHG). We have conducted a survey on existing national genomic policies in healthcare among Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) of the 28 EU member states, plus Norway. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to CMOs after a meeting on the policy implications of PHG held during the Italian presidency of the Council of EU in 2014. The survey was closed in November 2015. Results: CMOs response rate was 65.5% (19/29). Twelve (63.2%) reported that their countries had a policy for genomics in healthcare in place, and 15 (78.9%) reported that public funding existed. Public research facilities for the development of such policies were documented in 13 (68.4%) countries, and 15 (83.3%) had working groups devoted to policy development. National agencies carrying out Health Technology Assessment of genomic-based technologies were present in nine countries (50%). Sixteen (88.9%) countries reported having agencies dealing with ethical issues related to genomic technologies. About 55% of countries disclosed the lack of information campaigns aimed at citizens, and 44.4% reported they had a legal framework for direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Conclusion: Belgium, France, Italy, Spain and UK documented the presence of a policy on genomics in healthcare. While many caveats are necessary because of the methodology, results suggest a need for a co-ordinated effort to foster development and harmonization of dedicated policies across EU to responsibly integrate genomics policies into existing health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.