Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27687585›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2017

Current state of genomic policies in healthcare among EU member states: results of a survey of chief medical officers.

W Mazzucco, R Pastorino, T Lagerberg, M Colotto, E d'Andrea, C Marotta, C Marzuillo, P Villari, A Federici, W Ricciardi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

W MazzuccoSection of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
R PastorinoSection of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
T LagerbergSection of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
M ColottoSection of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
E d'AndreaDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
C MarottaSection of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
C MarzuilloDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
P VillariDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
A FedericiMinistry of Health, Rome, Italy.
W RicciardiSection of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
S BocciaSection of Hygiene, Institute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'Agostino Gemelli', Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A need for a governance of genomics in healthcare among European Union (EU) countries arose during an international meeting of experts on public health genomics (PHG). We have conducted a survey on existing national genomic policies in healthcare among Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) of the 28 EU member states, plus Norway. Methods: A questionnaire was sent to CMOs after a meeting on the policy implications of PHG held during the Italian presidency of the Council of EU in 2014. The survey was closed in November 2015. Results: CMOs response rate was 65.5% (19/29). Twelve (63.2%) reported that their countries had a policy for genomics in healthcare in place, and 15 (78.9%) reported that public funding existed. Public research facilities for the development of such policies were documented in 13 (68.4%) countries, and 15 (83.3%) had working groups devoted to policy development. National agencies carrying out Health Technology Assessment of genomic-based technologies were present in nine countries (50%). Sixteen (88.9%) countries reported having agencies dealing with ethical issues related to genomic technologies. About 55% of countries disclosed the lack of information campaigns aimed at citizens, and 44.4% reported they had a legal framework for direct-to-consumer genetic tests. Conclusion: Belgium, France, Italy, Spain and UK documented the presence of a policy on genomics in healthcare. While many caveats are necessary because of the methodology, results suggest a need for a co-ordinated effort to foster development and harmonization of dedicated policies across EU to responsibly integrate genomics policies into existing health systems.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareEuropean UnionGenomicsHealth PersonnelHumansNorwaySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27687585
PMCPMC5881673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.