Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27687175›Full record

ReviewMechanisms of ageing and development2017

DNA damage responses and stress resistance: Concepts from bacterial SOS to metazoan immunity.

Ashley B Williams, Björn Schumacher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mechanisms of ageing and development, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Drugging the Cancers Addicted to DNA Repair.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2017
    Review
  10. Editorial: DNA damage & immunity.Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashley B WilliamsInstitute for Genome Stability in Ageing and Disease, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 26, 50931 Cologne, Germany; Cologne Excellence Cluster for Cellular Stress Responses in Ageing-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC) and Systems Biology of Ageing Cologne, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 26, 50931 Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: awilliam@uni-koeln.de.
Björn SchumacherInstitute for Genome Stability in Ageing and Disease, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 26, 50931 Cologne, Germany; Cologne Excellence Cluster for Cellular Stress Responses in Ageing-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC) and Systems Biology of Ageing Cologne, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 26, 50931 Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: bjoern.schumacher@uni-koeln.de.

Funding

European Research Council 260383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The critical need for species preservation has driven the evolution of mechanisms that integrate stress signals from both exogenous and endogenous sources. Past research has been largely focused on cell-autonomous stress responses; however, recently their systemic outcomes within an organism and their implications at the ecological and species levels have emerged. Maintenance of species depends on the high fidelity transmission of the genome over infinite generations; thus, many pathways exist to monitor and restore the integrity of the genome and to coordinate DNA repair with other cellular processes, such as cell division and growth. The specifics of these DNA damage responses (DDRs) vary vastly but some general themes are conserved from ancient organisms, such as bacteria and archaea, to humans. Despite decades of research, however, DDRs still have many layers of complexity and some surprises left to be discovered. One of the most interesting current research topics is the link between DNA damage and stress resistance: the outcomes of DDRs can protect the organism from other secondary challenges. At this time, these types of responses are best characterized in bacteria and the simple metazoan model, Caenorhabditis elegans, but it is becoming clear that similar processes also exist in higher organisms.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaCaenorhabditis elegansDNA DamageAnimalsHumansSOS Response, GeneticsCaenorhabditis elegansDNA damage responseEscherichia coliImmunitySOS response

Identifiers

PMID27687175
PMCPMC5479470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.