Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27686784›Full record

ReviewZoological research2016

Lamprey: a model for vertebrate evolutionary research.

Yang Xu, Si-Wei Zhu, Qing-Wei Li

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zoological research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biliary Atresia Animal Models: Is the Needle in a Haystack?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Synaptic Vesicle Endocytosis in Different Model Systems.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  18. Pseudogenization of theZoological research · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang XuCollege of Life Science, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian Liaoning 116081, China;Lamprey Research Center, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian Liaoning 116081, China.
Si-Wei ZhuCollege of Life Science, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian Liaoning 116081, China;Lamprey Research Center, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian Liaoning 116081, China.
Qing-Wei LiCollege of Life Science, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian Liaoning 116081, China;Lamprey Research Center, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian Liaoning 116081, China. liqw@lnnu.edu.cn.
Liaoning Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lampreys belong to the superclass Cyclostomata and represent the most ancient group of vertebrates. Existing for over 360 million years, they are known as living fossils due to their many evolutionally conserved features. They are not only a keystone species for studying the origin and evolution of vertebrates, but also one of the best models for researching vertebrate embryonic development and organ differentiation. From the perspective of genetic information, the lamprey genome remains primitive compared with that of other higher vertebrates, and possesses abundant functional genes. Through scientific and technological progress, scientists have conducted in-depth studies on the nervous, endocrine, and immune systems of lampreys. Such research has significance for understanding and revealing the origin and evolution of vertebrates, and could contribute to a greater understanding of human diseases and treatments. This review presents the current progress and significance of lamprey research.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularLampreysModels, AnimalResearchAnimalsEndocrineFunctional geneImmuneLampreyNerve

Identifiers

PMID27686784
PMCPMC5071338
OpenAlexW2507533520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.