Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27686751›Full record

SynthesisResearch in nursing & health2017

Characteristics of Qualitative Descriptive Studies: A Systematic Review.

Hyejin Kim, Justine S Sefcik, Christine Bradway

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Research in nursing & health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05373550 (Effectiveness of a Nursing Educational Intervention on Quality of Life, Sexual Function, and Self-esteem in Hysterectomized Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 774 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
774citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05373550 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Nursing Educational Intervention on Quality of Life, Sexual Function, and Self-esteem in Hysterectomized Women: a Mixed-method Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de ConcepcionRan2021 to 2022Enrolled52ConditionsPrevention of Complications Due to HysterectomyArmsEffectiveness of a nursing educational intervention on quality of life, sexual function, and self-esteem in hysterectomized women: a mixed method approach.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

774 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

714 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyejin KimDoctoral Candidate, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, 418 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA, 19104.
Justine S SefcikDoctoral Candidate, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Christine BradwayAssociate Professor of Gerontological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Individualized Care for At Risk Older AdultsT32NR009356 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Lauren M Massimo, MARY D NAYLOR · 2007 to 2026
$7.8M
A mixed methods observational study of persistent vocalizations in nursing home residents with moderate to severe dementiaF31NR015693 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SEFCIK, JUSTINE SUZETTE · 2015 to 2016
$50k
Exploring Surrogates' Experiences of POLST Discussions for Nursing Home Residents with Advanced DementiaF31NR015702 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIM, HYEJIN · 2016 to 2016
$44k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR015693NINR NIH HHS F31 NR015702NINR NIH HHS T32 NR009356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Qualitative description (QD) is a term that is widely used to describe qualitative studies of health care and nursing-related phenomena. However, limited discussions regarding QD are found in the existing literature. In this systematic review, we identified characteristics of methods and findings reported in research articles published in 2014 whose authors identified the work as QD. After searching and screening, data were extracted from the sample of 55 QD articles and examined to characterize research objectives, design justification, theoretical/philosophical frameworks, sampling and sample size, data collection and sources, data analysis, and presentation of findings. In this review, three primary findings were identified. First, although there were some inconsistencies, most articles included characteristics consistent with the limited available QD definitions and descriptions. Next, flexibility or variability of methods was common and effective for obtaining rich data and achieving understanding of a phenomenon. Finally, justification for how a QD approach was chosen and why it would be an appropriate fit for a particular study was limited in the sample and, therefore, in need of increased attention. Based on these findings, recommendations include encouragement to researchers to provide as many details as possible regarding the methods of their QD studies so that readers can determine whether the methods used were reasonable and effective in producing useful findings. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchHumansResearch Designqualitative descriptionqualitative researchsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27686751
PMCPMC5225027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.