Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27686730›Full record

ArticleAmbio2017

Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications.

Mario S Di Bitetti, Julián A Ferreras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Investigating the landscape and trajectory of spina bifida research in Asia: a bibliometric analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clam research in Nunavut: A scoping review of the literature.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  17. Language inclusion intentions in scoping reviews.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2025
    Article
  18. Language barriers in conservation science citation networks.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Systematic Review of the Ovitrap Surveillance ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mario S Di BitettiInstituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS) - nodo Iguazú, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Calle Bertoni 85, 3370, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina. dibitetti@yahoo.com.ar.
Julián A FerrerasInstituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS) - nodo Posadas, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Calle Jujuy 1745, 3300, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a tendency for non-native English scientists to publish exclusively in English, assuming that this will make their articles more visible and cited. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the effect of language on the number of citations of articles published in six natural sciences journals from five countries that publish papers in either English or other languages. We analyzed the effect of language (English vs non-English), paper length, and year of publication on the number of citations. The articles published in English have a higher number of citations than those published in other languages, when the effect of journal, year of publication, and paper length are statistically controlled. This may result because English articles are accessible to a larger audience, but other factors need to be explored. Universities and scientific institutions should be aware of this situation and improve the teaching of English, especially in the natural sciences.

Indexed as

Journal Impact FactorLanguageScienceModels, StatisticalPeriodicals as TopicProbabilityEnglishLingua francaScientific evaluationScientific journalsScientific literature

Identifiers

PMID27686730
PMCPMC5226904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.