Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27686611›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2016

Searching and synthesising 'grey literature' and 'grey information' in public health: critical reflections on three case studies.

Jean Adams, Frances C Hillier-Brown, Helen J Moore, Amelia A Lake, Vera Araujo-Soares, Martin White, Carolyn Summerbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 199 papers, 39 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
199citing papers in PubMed, 39 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

199 citing papers in PubMed, 39 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Strategies for Enhancing the Implementation of Universal Mental Health Prevention Programs in Schools: A Systematic Review.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Factors influencing oral health behaviours, access and delivery of dental care for autistic children and adolescents: A mixed-methods systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it

139 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean AdamsPresent address: Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, UK. jma79@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5733-7830
Frances C Hillier-BrownFuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
Helen J MooreFuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
Amelia A LakeFuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.
Vera Araujo-SoaresInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, NE2 4AA, Newcastle, UK.
Martin WhitePresent address: Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, Cambridge, UK.
Carolyn SummerbellFuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrey literature includes a range of documents not controlled by commercial publishing organisations. This means that grey literature can be difficult to search and retrieve for evidence synthesis. Much knowledge and evidence in public health, and other fields, accumulates from innovation in practice. This knowledge may not even be of sufficient formality to meet the definition of grey literature. We term this knowledge 'grey information'. Grey information may be even harder to search for and retrieve than grey literature.

methodsOn three previous occasions, we have attempted to systematically search for and synthesise public health grey literature and information-both to summarise the extent and nature of particular classes of interventions and to synthesise results of evaluations. Here, we briefly describe these three 'case studies' but focus on our post hoc critical reflections on searching for and synthesising grey literature and information garnered from our experiences of these case studies. We believe these reflections will be useful to future researchers working in this area.

resultsIssues discussed include search methods, searching efficiency, replicability of searches, data management, data extraction, assessing study 'quality', data synthesis, time and resources, and differentiating evidence synthesis from primary research.

conclusionsInformation on applied public health research questions relating to the nature and range of public health interventions, as well as many evaluations of these interventions, may be predominantly, or only, held in grey literature and grey information. Evidence syntheses on these topics need, therefore, to embrace grey literature and information. Many typical systematic review methods for searching, appraising, managing, and synthesising the evidence base can be adapted for use with grey literature and information. Evidence synthesisers should carefully consider the opportunities and problems offered by including grey literature and information. Enhanced incentives for accurate recording and further methodological developments in retrieval will facilitate future syntheses of grey literature and information.

Indexed as

Evidence synthesisGrey informationGrey literatureInterventionsPublic healthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27686611
PMCPMC5041336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.