Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27686559›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2017

Evaluating genomic DNA extraction methods from human whole blood using endpoint and real-time PCR assays.

Linda Koshy, A L Anju, S Harikrishnan, V R Kutty, V T Jissa, Irin Kurikesu, Parvathy Jayachandran, A Jayakumaran Nair, A Gangaprasad, G M Nair and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association between Sex-RelatedJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Aberrant Methylation of Aging-Related Genes in Asthma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Measuring coverage and accuracy of whole-exome sequencing in clinical context.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda KoshyDepartment of Biotechnology, Inter-University Centre for Genomics and Gene Technology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, 695 581, India. lindakoshy@gmail.com.
A L AnjuDepartment of Biotechnology, Inter-University Centre for Genomics and Gene Technology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, 695 581, India.
S HarikrishnanDepartment of Cardiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, 695 011, India.
V R KuttyAchutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, 695 011, India.
V T JissaAchutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, 695 011, India.
Irin KurikesuDepartment of Biotechnology, Inter-University Centre for Genomics and Gene Technology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, 695 581, India.
Parvathy JayachandranDepartment of Biotechnology, Inter-University Centre for Genomics and Gene Technology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, 695 581, India.
A Jayakumaran NairDepartment of Biotechnology, Inter-University Centre for Genomics and Gene Technology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, 695 581, India.
A GangaprasadDepartment of Biotechnology, Inter-University Centre for Genomics and Gene Technology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, 695 581, India.
G M NairDepartment of Biotechnology, Inter-University Centre for Genomics and Gene Technology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, 695 581, India.
P R SudhakaranDepartment of Biotechnology, Inter-University Centre for Genomics and Gene Technology, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, 695 581, India.
University of Kerala · INSree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extraction of genomic DNA is the crucial first step in large-scale epidemiological studies. Though there are many popular DNA isolation methods from human whole blood, only a few reports have compared their efficiencies using both end-point and real-time PCR assays. Genomic DNA was extracted from coronary artery disease patients using solution-based conventional protocols such as the phenol-chloroform/proteinase-K method and a non-phenolic non-enzymatic Rapid-Method, which were evaluated and compared vis-a-vis a commercially available silica column-based Blood DNA isolation kit. The appropriate method for efficiently extracting relatively pure DNA was assessed based on the total DNA yield, concentration, purity ratios (A

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsChemical FractionationCoronary Artery DiseaseDNADNA, MitochondrialFemaleHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPaseY ChromosomeAtp1a3 protein, mouseDNADNA, MitochondrialSodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPaseDNA isolationPurityReal-time PCRSNP genotypingWhole blood

Identifiers

PMID27686559
OpenAlexW2527020105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.