Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27686493›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2016

Causes of hepatic capsular retraction: a pictorial essay.

Gary Xia Vern Tan, Rhian Miranda, Tom Sutherland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CEUS LI-RADS: a pictorial review.Insights into imaging · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gary Xia Vern TanDepartment of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, 41, Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia. gary.tan@svha.org.au.
Rhian MirandaAuckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tom SutherlandDepartment of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, 41, Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatic capsular retraction refers to the loss of the normal convex hepatic contour, with the formation of an area of flattening or concavity. This can result from myriad causes, including intrinsic hepatic conditions such as cirrhosis, biliary obstruction, benign tumours, malignancy and infections, as well as extrahepatic causes such as trauma. This article aims to provide familiarity with this wide spectrum of conditions, including mimics of hepatic capsular retraction, by highlighting the anatomic, pathologic and imaging features that help distinguish these entities from one another. TEACHING POINTS: • Hepatic capsular retraction can occur due to various intrinsic or extrinsic hepatic causes. • Hepatic capsular retraction is observed in both benign and malignant conditions. • Recognising associated imaging features can help elicit causes of hepatic capsular retraction.

Indexed as

Capsular retractionComputed tomographyLiverLiver abnormalitiesPseudo-retraction

Identifiers

PMID27686493
PMCPMC5110478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.