Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27685805›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2017

Population-Based Incidence Rates of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Era.

Vicki B Benard, Philip E Castle, Steven A Jenison, William C Hunt, Jane J Kim, Jack Cuzick, Ji-Hyun Lee, Ruofei Du, Michael Robertson, Scott Norville and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Immunogenicity of anHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Decreases in Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Types 16 and 18 in Cervical Precancers: HPV-IMPACT, 2008 to 2019.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vicki B BenardDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Philip E CastleDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Steven A JenisonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque.
William C HuntHouse of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque.
Jane J KimDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jack CuzickCentre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, England.
Ji-Hyun LeeDivision of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Preventive Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque.
Ruofei DuUniversity of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque.
Michael RobertsonHouse of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque.
Scott NorvilleDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque.
Cosette M WheelerHouse of Prevention Epidemiology (HOPE), Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque.
New Mexico HPV Pap Registry Steering Committee
University of New Mexico · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Web enhanced adoption of HPV vaccine in minority communitiesU19AI084081 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI OZBUN, MICHELLE A · 2009 to 2013
$13.4M
The EPI-STI Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core (Cuzick/Wheeler)U19AI113187 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI WHEELER, COSETTE MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$12.6M
Cancer Research UK 16891NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI084081NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI113187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceA substantial effect of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines on reducing HPV-related cervical disease is essential before modifying clinical practice guidelines in partially vaccinated populations.

objectiveTo determine the population-based cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) trends when adjusting for changes in cervical screening practices that overlapped with HPV vaccination implementation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThe New Mexico HPV Pap Registry, which captures population-based estimates of both cervical screening prevalence and CIN, was used to compute CIN trends from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2014. Under New Mexico Administrative Code, the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry, a statewide public health surveillance program, receives mandatory reporting of all cervical screening (cytologic and HPV testing) and any cervical, vulvar, and vaginal histopathological findings for all women residing in New Mexico irrespective of outcome.

main outcome measuresPrespecified outcome measures included low-grade CIN (grade 1 [CIN1]) and high-grade CIN (grade 2 [CIN2] and grade 3 [CIN3]).

resultsFrom 2007 to 2014, a total of 13 520 CIN1, 4296 CIN2, and 2823 CIN3 lesions were diagnosed among female individuals 15 to 29 years old. After adjustment for changes in cervical screening across the period, reductions in the CIN incidence per 100 000 women screened were significant for all grades of CIN among female individuals 15 to 19 years old, dropping from 3468.3 to 1590.6 for CIN1 (annual percentage change [APC], -9.0; 95% CI, -12.0 to -5.8; P < .001), from 896.4 to 414.9 for CIN2 (APC, -10.5; 95% CI, -18.8 to -1.2; P = .03), and from 240.2 to 0 for CIN3 (APC, -41.3; 95% CI, -65.7 to 0.3; P = .05). Reductions in the CIN2 incidence were also significant for women 20 to 24 years old, dropping from 1027.7 to 627.1 (APC, -6.3; 95% CI, -10.9 to -1.4; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Population-level decreases in CIN among cohorts partially vaccinated for HPV may be considered when clinical practice guidelines for cervical cancer screening are reassessed. Evidence is rapidly growing to suggest that further increases in raising the age to start screening are imminent, one step toward integrating screening and vaccination.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus VaccinesAdolescentAdultAge DistributionEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIncidenceNew MexicoPapillomavirus InfectionsRegistriesUterine Cervical DysplasiaYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27685805
PMCPMC5765871
OpenAlexW2527528289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.