Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27685467›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2016

Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination.

Kirsten S Evonuk, Carson E Moseley, Ryan E Doyle, Casey T Weaver, Tara M DeSilva

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kirsten S EvonukPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Carson E MoseleyDepartment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Ryan E DoylePhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Casey T WeaverDepartment of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Tara M DeSilvaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Department of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham; Center for Glial Biology and Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham; desilvt@ccf.org.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

IMMUNOLOGIC DISEASES AND BASIC IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007051 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Laurie Ellen Harrington · 1985 to 2026
$13.1M
Mechanisms of Activity-Dependent Myelination in the Visual SystemR01EY025687 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DESILVA, TARA MARIA · 2015 to 2019
$2.4M
Center for Glial Biology in Medicine Research Recruitment Core CenterP30NS069324 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SONTHEIMER, HARALD W · 2009 to 2010
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025687NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007051NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS069324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major hallmark of the autoimmune demyelinating disease multiple sclerosis (MS) is immune cell infiltration into the brain and spinal cord resulting in myelin destruction, which not only slows conduction of nerve impulses, but causes axonal injury resulting in motor and cognitive decline. Current treatments for MS focus on attenuating immune cell infiltration into the central nervous system (CNS). These treatments decrease the number of relapses, improving quality of life, but do not completely eliminate relapses so long-term disability is not improved. Therefore, therapeutic agents that protect the CNS are warranted. In both animal models as well as human patients with MS, T cell entry into the CNS is generally considered the initiating inflammatory event. In order to assess if a drug protects the CNS, any potential effects on immune cell infiltration or proliferation in the periphery must be ruled out. This protocol describes how to determine whether CNS protection observed after drug intervention is a consequence of attenuating CNS-infiltrating immune cells or blocking death of CNS cells during inflammatory insults. The ability to examine MS treatments that are protective to the CNS during inflammatory insults is highly critical for the advancement of therapeutic strategies since current treatments reduce, but do not completely eliminate, relapses (i.e., immune cell infiltration), leaving the CNS vulnerable to degeneration.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous SystemEncephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, ExperimentalFlow CytometryImmune SystemImmunohistochemistryImmunosuppressive AgentsMice, Inbred C57BLNeuroprotective AgentsImmunosuppressive AgentsNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID27685467
PMCPMC5092010
OpenAlexW2519823325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.