Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27685442›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2016

Detection of candidate biomarkers of prostate cancer progression in serum: a depletion-free 3D LC/MS quantitative proteomics pilot study.

S E T Larkin, H E Johnston, T R Jackson, D G Jamieson, T I Roumeliotis, C I Mockridge, A Michael, A Manousopoulou, E K Papachristou, M D Brown and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Advances in Prostate Cancer Biomarkers and Probes.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Role of cystatin C in urogenital malignancy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

S E T LarkinCancer Sciences Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
H E JohnstonCancer Sciences Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
T R JacksonInstitute of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4QL, UK.
D G JamiesonBiorelate, BASE, Greenhey's, Manchester Science Park, Pencroft Way, Manchester M15 6JJ, UK.
T I RoumeliotisInstitute for Life Sciences, Centre for Proteomic Research, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
C I MockridgeCancer Sciences Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
A MichaelFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7TE, UK.
A ManousopoulouInstitute for Life Sciences, Centre for Proteomic Research, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
E K PapachristouCancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
M D BrownInstitute of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Paterson Building, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
N W ClarkeThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
H PandhaFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7TE, UK.
C L Aukim-HastieFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7TE, UK.
M S CraggCancer Sciences Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
S D GarbisCancer Sciences Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
P A TownsendInstitute of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4QL, UK.
University of Southampton · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBCancer Research UK Manchester Institute · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_14112Medical Research Council MR/M008959/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is the most common male cancer in the United Kingdom and we aimed to identify clinically relevant biomarkers corresponding to stage progression of the disease.

methodsWe used enhanced proteomic profiling of PCa progression using iTRAQ 3D LC mass spectrometry on high-quality serum samples to identify biomarkers of PCa.

resultsWe identified >1000 proteins. Following specific inclusion/exclusion criteria we targeted seven proteins of which two were validated by ELISA and six potentially interacted forming an 'interactome' with only a single protein linking each marker. This network also includes accepted cancer markers, such as TNF, STAT3, NF-κB and IL6.

conclusionsOur linked and interrelated biomarker network highlights the potential utility of six of our seven markers as a panel for diagnosing PCa and, critically, in determining the stage of the disease. Our validation analysis of the MS-identified proteins found that SAA alongside KLK3 may improve categorisation of PCa than by KLK3 alone, and that TSR1, although not significant in this model, might also be a clinically relevant biomarker.

Indexed as

Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationBiomarkers, TumorBlood Chemical AnalysisChromatography, LiquidDisease ProgressionEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansMalePilot ProjectsPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID27685442
PMCPMC5117786
OpenAlexW2525932235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.