ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2016
Long-Term Storage at -80°C: Effect on Rate of Recovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis From Direct Acid-Fast Bacilli Smear-Positive Sputum Samples.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence-based standardization of infectious disease biobanking: aligning specimen preservation and clinical metadata withFrontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Nontuberculous Mycobacteria as Sapronoses: A Review.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in the rate of recovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) from routinely cultured sputum and long-term stored sputum specimens (at -80°C) using Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) media, Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (BBL MGIT(TM) ), and Middlebrook 7H11 (MB 7H11) agar.
methodsDirect acid-fast bacilli smear-positive sputum specimens (both before and after storage [n = 136]) were studied (after culturing on LJ media, BBL MGIT(TM) , and MB 7H11 agar) and the performances were compared.
resultsFor the detection of MTB, BBL MGIT(TM) and MB 7H11 agar (before storage) demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 98.28%, 30.77%, 92.68%, 66.67%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.41%, 30.77%, 92.62%, 57.14%, respectively, when compared to LJ media (before storage). Similarly, BBL MGIT(TM) and MB 7H11 agar (after storage) demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 95.5%, 38.89%, 90.6%, 58.33%, and 95.5%, 66.67 %, 94.64%, 70.59%, respectively, when compared to LJ media (after storage) for the detection of MTB.
conclusionNone of the culture techniques independently (both before and after storage) detected growth of MTB from all the sputum specimens studied. However, BBL MGIT(TM) system and LJ media combination (both before and after storage) effectively detected the growth of MTB from sputum specimens when compared to other culture technique combinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.