Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27685158›Full record

ArticlePloS one

Anticipated Notification of Sexual Partners following STD Diagnosis among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women in Lima, Peru: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Jesse L Clark, Amaya G Perez-Brumer, Eddy R Segura, Hector J Salvatierra, Jorge Sanchez, Javier R Lama

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Attitudes About the Use of Geosocial Networking Applications for HIV/STD Partner Notification: A Qualitative Study.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesse L ClarkUCLA Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Amaya G Perez-BrumerColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States of America.
Eddy R SeguraUCLA Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Hector J SalvatierraAsociacion Civil Impacta Salud y Educacion, Lima, Peru.
Jorge SanchezAsociacion Civil Impacta Salud y Educacion, Lima, Peru.
Javier R LamaAsociacion Civil Impacta Salud y Educacion, Lima, Peru.
Asociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación · PEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USColumbia University · US

Funding

GSH Training GrantT32HD049339 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jennifer S Hirsch · 2006 to 2026
$3.4M
Partner Notification Strategies for HIV/STI Control in PeruK23MH084611 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CLARK, JESSE LAWTON · 2009 to 2013
$755k
Expedited Partner Therapy and STI Control for MSM in PeruR21MH092232 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COATES, THOMAS J. · 2011 to 2012
$323k
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049339NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH084611NIMH NIH HHS L30 MH084639NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH092232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew strategies to support partner notification (PN) are critical for STD control and require detailed understanding of how specific individual and partnership characteristics guide notification decisions.

methodsFrom 2011 to 2012, 397 MSM and TW recently diagnosed with HIV, syphilis, or another STD completed a survey on anticipated notification of recent sexual partners and associated factors. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a subset of participants to provide further depth to quantitative findings. Prevalence ratios and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used to analyze participant- and partner-level factors associated with anticipated PN.

resultsAmong all partners reported, 52.5% were described as "Very Likely" or "Somewhat Likely" to be notified. Anticipated notification was more likely for main partners than casual (adjusted Prevalence Ratio [aPR], 95% CI: 0.63, 0.54-0.75) or commercial (aPR, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.31-0.62) partners. Other factors associated with likely notification included perception of the partner as an STD source (aPR, 95% CI: 1.27, 1.10-1.48) and anticipated future sexual contact with the partner (aPR, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.11-1.52). An HIV diagnosis was associated with a lower likelihood of notification than non-HIV STDs (aPR: 0.68, 0.55-0.86). Qualitative discussion of the barriers and incentives to PN reflected a similar differentiation of anticipated notification according to partnership type and type of HIV/STD diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Detailed attention to how partnership characteristics guide notification outcomes is essential to the development of new PN strategies. By accurately and thoroughly assessing the diversity of partnership interactions among individuals with HIV/STD, new notification techniques can be tailored to partner-specific circumstances.

Indexed as

AdultContact TracingFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMotivationPeruSexually Transmitted DiseasesTransgender Persons

Identifiers

PMID27685158
PMCPMC5042523
OpenAlexW2525867581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.