Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27684938›Full record

ArticlePloS one

CD147 and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fei Peng, Hui Li, Zhaoze Ning, Zhenyu Yang, Hongru Li, Yonggang Wang, Fang Chen, Yi Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. CD147 and glioma: a meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. CD147 expression lacks prognostic relevance in esophageal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. CD147-mediated chemotaxis of CD4Clinical rheumatology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fei PengPeople's Hospital of Hunan Province, Chang Sha, Hu Nan Province, China.
Hui LiReproductive Department, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhaoze NingPeople's Hospital of Hunan Province, Chang Sha, Hu Nan Province, China.
Zhenyu YangUrology of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hongru LiXiangya Medical School, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yonggang WangReproductive Department, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Fang ChenPeople's Hospital of Hunan Province, Chang Sha, Hu Nan Province, China.
Yi WuPeople's Hospital of Hunan Province, Chang Sha, Hu Nan Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2515-8942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is one of the most common non-cutaneous malignancies in men. We aimed to systemically evaluate the relationship between the expression of CD147 in tissues and the clinicopathological features of prostate cancer. METHODS AND

findingsPubMed (1966-2016), EMBASE (1980-2016), the Cochrane Library (1996-2016), Web of Science (1945-2016), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (1982-2016), and the WanFang databases (1988-2016) were searched. Literature quality assessment was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis was performed by using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 13.0. A total of 12591 prostate cancer patients from 14 studies were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in the positive expression rate in the following comparisons: prostatic cancer tissues vs. normal prostate tissues (odds ratio [OR] = 26.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.95-91.20, P < 0.00001), prostatic cancer tissues vs. benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues (OR = 20.54, 95% CI 8.20-51.44, P < 0.00001), high Gleason score vs. low Gleason score (OR = 2.39, 95% CI 1.33-4.27, P = 0.03), TNM III to IV vs. TNM I to II (OR = 9.95, 95% CI 4.96-19.96, P < 0.00001), low or moderate differentiation vs. high differentiation (OR = 8.12, 95% CI 3.69-17.85, P < 0.00001), lymph node metastasis vs. non-lymph node metastasis (OR = 4.31, 95% CI 1.11-16.71, P = 0.03), and distant metastasis vs. non-distant metastasis (OR = 8.90, 95% CI 3.24-24.42, P < 0.00001).

conclusionThe CD147 positive expression rate was closely related to the clinical characteristics of prostate cancer, but more research is needed to confirm the findings owing to the results of the subgroups.

Identifiers

PMID27684938
PMCPMC5042541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.