Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27684727›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2016

A Rat Carotid Balloon Injury Model to Test Anti-vascular Remodeling Therapeutics.

Natalia Petrasheskaya, Hyun-Jin Tae, Ismayil Ahmet, Mark I Talan, Edward G Lakatta, Li Lin

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalia PetrasheskayaLaboratory of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute on Aging.
Hyun-Jin TaeLaboratory of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute on Aging; Department of Biomedical Science and Research Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hallym University.
Ismayil AhmetLaboratory of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute on Aging.
Mark I TalanLaboratory of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute on Aging.
Edward G LakattaLaboratory of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute on Aging.
Li LinLaboratory of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute on Aging; linli@grc.nia.nih.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rat carotid balloon injury is a well-established surgical model that has been used to study arterial remodeling and vascular cell proliferation. It is also a valuable model system to test, and to evaluate therapeutics and drugs that negate maladaptive remodeling in the vessel. The injury, or barotrauma, in the vessel lumen caused by an inflated balloon via an inserted catheter induces subsequent neointimal growth, often leading to hyperplasia or thickening of the vessel wall that narrows, or obstructs the lumen. The method described here is sufficiently sensitive, and the results can be obtained in relatively short time (2 weeks after the surgery). The efficacy of the drug or therapeutic against the induced-remodeling can be evaluated either by the post-mortem pathological and histomorphological analysis, or by ultrasound sonography in live animals. In addition, this model system has also been used to determine the therapeutic window or the time course of the administered drug. These studies can leadto the development of a better administrative strategy and a better therapeutic outcome. The procedure described here provides a tool for translational studies that bring drug and therapeutic candidates from bench research to clinical applications.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery InjuriesDisease Models, AnimalVascular RemodelingAnimalsHumansHyperplasiaNeointimaRatsTunica Intima

Identifiers

PMID27684727
PMCPMC5092041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.