Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27684413›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

Characteristics of neonatal transports in California.

V P Akula, J B Gould, P Kan, L Bollman, J Profit, H C Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Summary of neonatal and maternal transport and reimbursement policies-a 5-year update.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Factors associated with follow-up of infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy in a high-risk infant clinic in California.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V P AkulaDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J B GouldDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
P KanCalifornia Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
L BollmanCalifornia Perinatal Transport System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J ProfitDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
H C LeeDivision of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Stanford University · USCalifornia Department of Transportation · USLucile Packard Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (SCCTER)UL1UL1TR000093 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2012 to 2013
$6.5M
Maternal, Clinician & Hospital Factors in Breastmilk for Premature InfantsK23HD068400 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEE, HENRY CHONG · 2012 to 2015
$520k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000093NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD068400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the current scope of neonatal inter-facility transports. STUDY

designCalifornia databases were used to characterize infants transported in the first week after birth from 2009 to 2012.

resultsTransport of the 22 550 neonates was classified as emergent 9383 (41.6%), urgent 8844 (39.2%), scheduled 2082 (9.2%) and other 85 (0.4%). In addition, 2152 (9.5%) were initiated for delivery attendance. Most transports originated from hospitals without a neonatal intensive care unit (68%), with the majority transferred to regional centers (66%). Compared with those born and cared for at the birth hospital, the odds of being transported were higher if the patient's mother was Hispanic, <20 years old, or had a previous C-section. An Apgar score <3 at 10 min of age, cardiac compressions in the delivery room, or major birth defect were also risk factors for neonatal transport.

conclusionAs many neonates receive transport within the first week after birth, there may be opportunities for quality improvement activities in this area.

Indexed as

CaliforniaCase-Control StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTransportation of Patients

Identifiers

PMID27684413
OpenAlexW2525654076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.