Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27683900›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Shared Neural Mechanisms for the Evaluation of Intense Sensory Stimulation and Economic Reward, Dependent on Stimulation-Seeking Behavior.

Agnes Norbury, Vincent Valton, Geraint Rees, Jonathan P Roiser, Masud Husain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Systems genetics of sensation seeking.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2019
    Article
  6. Tracking Deceased-Related Thinking with Neural Pattern Decoding of a Cortical-Basal Ganglia Circuit.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agnes NorburyInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom, and aen31@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4377-3164
Vincent ValtonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2508-6731
Geraint ReesInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-7007
Jonathan P RoiserInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, United Kingdom, and.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-1228
Masud HusainDepartment of Experimental Psychology and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-9255

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWhy are some people strongly motivated by intense sensory experiences? Here we investigated how people encode the value of an intense sensory experience compared with economic reward, and how this varies according to stimulation-seeking preference. Specifically, we used a novel behavioral task in combination with computational modeling to derive the value individuals assigned to the opportunity to experience an intense tactile stimulus (mild electric shock). We then examined functional imaging data recorded during task performance to see how the opportunity to experience the sensory stimulus was encoded in stimulation-seekers versus stimulation-avoiders. We found that for individuals who positively sought out this kind of sensory stimulation, there was common encoding of anticipated economic and sensory rewards in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Conversely, there was robust encoding of the modeled probability of receiving such stimulation in the insula only in stimulation-avoidant individuals. Finally, we found preliminary evidence that sensory prediction error signals may be positively signed for stimulation-seekers, but negatively signed for stimulation-avoiders, in the posterior cingulate cortex. These findings may help explain why high intensity sensory experiences are appetitive for some individuals, but not for others, and may have relevance for the increased vulnerability for some psychopathologies, but perhaps increased resilience for others, in high sensation-seeking individuals. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: People vary in their preference for intense sensory experiences. Here, we investigated how different individuals evaluate the prospect of an unusual sensory experience (electric shock), compared with the opportunity to gain a more traditional reward (money). We found that in a subset of individuals who sought out such unusual sensory stimulation, anticipation of the sensory outcome was encoded in the same way as that of monetary gain, in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Further understanding of stimulation-seeking behavior may shed light on the etiology of psychopathologies such as addiction, for which high or low sensation-seeking personality has been identified as a risk factor.

Indexed as

RewardChoice BehaviorElectric StimulationExploratory BehaviorExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMotivationNerve NetNeural InhibitionNeural PathwaysSelf StimulationYoung Adultaddictiondecision-makingimpulsivityindividual differencessensation-seekingvalue

Identifiers

PMID27683900
PMCPMC5039253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.