Trial reportNeurology2016
Deconstructing tolerance with clobazam: Post hoc analyses from an open-label extension study.
Trial report in Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Clobazam in Patients With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
Safety and Effectiveness of Open-Label Clobazam in Subjects With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which are the options and dosages for clobazam shortages on epilepsy treatment? Review of literature and survey of specialists.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Review
- Review
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobazam in Adults With Drug-Refractory Epilepsy.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2021Article
- Functional characterization of the antiepileptic drug candidate, padsevonil, on GABAEpilepsia · 2020Article
- Systematic review of clobazam use in patients with status epilepticus.Epilepsia open · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate potential development of tolerance to adjunctive clobazam in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
methodsEligible patients enrolled in open-label extension study OV-1004, which continued until clobazam was commercially available in the United States or for a maximum of 2 years outside the United States. Enrolled patients started at 0.5 mg·kg
resultsData from 200 patients were included. For patients free of drop seizures, there was no notable change in dosage over 24 months. For responder groups still exhibiting drop seizures, dosages were increased. Weekly drop-seizure rates for 100% and ≥75% responders demonstrated a consistent response over time. Few patients had a dosage increase ≥40% associated with an increase in seizure rates.
conclusionsTwo-year findings suggest that the majority of patients do not develop tolerance to the antiseizure actions of clobazam. Observed dosage increases may reflect best efforts to achieve seizure freedom. It is possible that the clinical development of tolerance to clobazam has been overstated. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00518713 and NCT01160770. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that the majority of patients do not develop tolerance to clobazam over 2 years of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.