Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27683556›Full record

ArticleCancer discovery2016

Immunogenomics of Hypermutated Glioblastoma: A Patient with Germline POLE Deficiency Treated with Checkpoint Blockade Immunotherapy.

Tanner M Johanns, Christopher A Miller, Ian G Dorward, Christina Tsien, Edward Chang, Arie Perry, Ravindra Uppaluri, Cole Ferguson, Robert E Schmidt, Sonika Dahiya and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer discovery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04761744 (A Phase II Study of Nivolumab in Patients With Genetic Alterations in DNA Damage Repair and Response Who Progressed After Standard Treatment for Metastatic Solid Cancers), which is not on this map. Cited by 198 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
198citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04761744 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Study of Nivolumab in Patients With Genetic Alterations in DNA Damage Repair and Response Who Progressed After Standard Treatment for Metastatic Solid Cancers

TypeinterventionalSponsorKorean Cancer Study GroupRan2019 to 2021Enrolled48ConditionsDDR Gene Mutation, Metastatic Solid TumorArmsNivolumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

198 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 291 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Randomized Phase II and Biomarker Study of Pembrolizumab plus Bevacizumab versus Pembrolizumab Alone for Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

138 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanner M JohannsDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Christopher A MillerMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Ian G DorwardDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Christina TsienDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Edward ChangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Arie PerryDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ravindra UppaluriDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Cole FergusonDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Robert E SchmidtDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sonika DahiyaDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
George AnsstasDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Elaine R MardisMcDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. gpdunn@wustl.edu Elaine.Mardis@nationwidechildrens.org.
Gavin P DunnCenter for Human Immunology and Immunotherapy Programs, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. gpdunn@wustl.edu Elaine.Mardis@nationwidechildrens.org.
Washington University in St. Louis · USJames S. McDonnell Foundation · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

PRE-AND POSTGRADUATE TRAINING IN MOLECULAR HEMATOLOGYT32HL007088 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Grant Anthony Challen, Stephen Oh · 1985 to 2026
$14.1M
IMMUNOBIOLOGY OF MALIGNANT GLIOMAK08NS092912 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUNN, GAVIN PETER · 2015 to 2019
$877k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007088NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS092912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present the case of a patient with a left frontal glioblastoma with primitive neuroectodermal tumor features and hypermutated genotype in the setting of a POLE germline alteration. During standard-of-care chemoradiation, the patient developed a cervical spine metastasis and was subsequently treated with pembrolizumab. Shortly thereafter, the patient developed an additional metastatic spinal lesion. Using whole-exome DNA sequencing and clonal analysis, we report changes in the subclonal architecture throughout treatment. Furthermore, a persistently high neoantigen load was observed within all tumors. Interestingly, following initiation of pembrolizumab, brisk lymphocyte infiltration was observed in the subsequently resected metastatic spinal lesion and an objective radiographic response was noted in a progressive intracranial lesion, suggestive of active central nervous system (CNS) immunosurveillance following checkpoint blockade therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: It is unclear whether hypermutated glioblastomas are susceptible to checkpoint blockade in adults. Herein, we provide proof of principle that glioblastomas with DNA-repair defects treated with checkpoint blockade may result in CNS immune activation, leading to clinically and immunologically significant responses. These patients may represent a genomically stratified group for whom immunotherapy could be considered. Cancer Discov; 6(11); 1230-6. ©2016 AACR.See related commentary by Snyder and Wolchok, p. 1210This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1197.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCell Cycle CheckpointsDNA Polymerase IIGerm-Line MutationGlioblastomaHumansMalePoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDNA Polymerase IIpembrolizumabPOLE protein, humanPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27683556
PMCPMC5140283
OpenAlexW2524525752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.