Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27683548›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Behavioral and TMS Markers of Action Observation Might Reflect Distinct Neuronal Processes.

Sébastien Hétu, Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel, Hadj Boumediene Meziane, Philip L Jackson, Catherine Mercier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sébastien HétuCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Québec, QCCanada; Human Neuroimaging Laboratory, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VAUSA.
Vincent Taschereau-DumouchelCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Québec, QCCanada; Psychology Department, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CAUSA.
Hadj Boumediene MezianeCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Québec, QCCanada; Institut de psychologie, Université de Lausanne, LausanneSwitzerland.
Philip L JacksonCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Québec, QCCanada; Département de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec, QCCanada; Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec, Québec, QCCanada.
Catherine MercierCentre Interdisciplinaire de Recherche en Réadaptation et Intégration Sociale, Québec, QCCanada; Département de Réadaptation, Université Laval, Québec, QCCanada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies have shown that observing an action induces muscle-specific changes in corticospinal excitability. From a signal detection theory standpoint, this pattern can be related to sensitivity, which here would measure the capacity to distinguish between two action observation conditions. In parallel to these TMS studies, action observation has also been linked to behavioral effects such as motor priming and interference. It has been hypothesized that behavioral markers of action observation could be related to TMS markers and thus represent a potentially cost-effective mean of assessing the functioning of the action-perception system. However, very few studies have looked at possible relationships between these two measures. The aim of this study was to investigate if individual differences in sensitivity to action observation could be related to the behavioral motor priming and interference effects produced by action observation. To this end, 14 healthy participants observed index and little finger movements during a TMS task and a stimulus-response compatibility task. Index muscle displayed sensitivity to action observation, and action observation resulted in significant motor priming+interference, while no significant effect was observed for the little finger in both task. Nevertheless, our results indicate that the sensitivity measured in TMS was not related to the behavioral changes measured in the stimulus-response compatibility task. Contrary to a widespread assumption, the current results indicate that individual differences in physiological and behavioral markers of action observation may be unrelated. This could have important impacts on the potential use of behavioral markers in place of more costly physiological markers of action observation in clinical settings.

Indexed as

action observationautomatic imitationmirror neuronsmotor interferencemotor primingsensitivitystimulus–response compatibilityTMS

Identifiers

PMID27683548
PMCPMC5021688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.