Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27683458›Full record

ArticleEJIFCC2014

miRNA in Prostate Cancer: New Prospects for Old Challenges.

Samy M Mekhail, Peter G Yousef, Stephen W Jackinsky, Maria Pasic, George M Yousef

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJIFCC, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 71% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Urinary microRNAs expression in prostate cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samy M MekhailDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine, and the Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science at the Li KaShing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Peter G YousefAmerican International College of Arts and Sciences , Antigua.
Stephen W JackinskyAmerican International College of Arts and Sciences , Antigua.
Maria PasicDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine, St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, Canada.
George M YousefDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine, and the Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science at the Li KaShing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers among men but has limited prognostic biomarkers available for follow up. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate expression of their target genes. Accumulating experimental evidence reports differential miRNA expression in PCa, and that miRNAs are actively involved in the pathogenesis and progression of PCa. miRNA and androgen receptor signaling cross-talk is an established factor in PCa pathogenesis. Differential miRNA expression was found between patients with high versus low Gleason scores, and was also observed in patients with biochemical failure, hormone-resistant cancer and in metastasis. Metastasis requires epithelial-mesenchymal transition which shares many cancer stem cell biological characteristics and both are associated with miRNA dysregulation. In the era of personalized medicine, there is a broad spectrum of potential clinical applications of miRNAs. These applications can significantly improve PCa management including their use as diagnostic and/or prognostic markers, or as predictive markers for treatment efficiency. Preliminary evidence demonstrates that miRNAs can also be used for risk stratification. Circulatory miRNAs can serve as non-invasive biomarkers in urine and/or serum of PCa patients. More recently, analysis of miRNAs and circulating tumor cells are gaining significant attention. Moreover, miRNAs represent an attractive new class of therapeutic targets for PCa. Here, we summarize the current knowledge and the future prospects of miRNAs in PCa, their advantages, and potential challenges as tissue and circulating biomarkers. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among men in western populations. The American Cancer Society estimated 239, 590 new cases and 29, 720 expected deaths in the USA in 2013. One in every six men are at risk of developing PCa during their lifetime (1). Currently, the standard biomarker for PCa diagnosis is prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which has its limitations, leading to the risks of PCa over diagnosis and harmful overtreatment. The prognostic value of PSA is also questionable (2). Stepping into the new epoch of personalized medicine, molecular markers are urgently needed to improve the different aspects of PCa management (3). miRNAs represent an attractive class of emerging biomarkers that can help in this regard (4;5).

Indexed as

cancer stem cellscirculating tumor cellsmiRNApersonalized medicineprognosisprostate cancerSNPstumor markers

Identifiers

PMID27683458
PMCPMC4975192
OpenAlexW2552237430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.