ArticleEJIFCC2014
Genetic and Epigenetic Changes After Spermatogonial Stem Cell Culture and Transplantation.
Article in EJIFCC, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro Gamete Production in Mammals: Decades of Pioneering Approaches in Germ Cell and Stem Cell Biology Supporting Innovative Discovery and Expansion of Human Reproductive Potential.Molecular reproduction and development · 2025Review
- In vivo and in vitro sperm production: an overview of the challenges and advances in male fertility restoration.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Men with testicular failure, either primary or secondary, have been shown to be interested in fertility preservation. Spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) transplantation is currently being investigated as a treatment for this. Currently this experimental technique consists of cryopreservation of a testicular biopsy prior to cancer treatment, followed by optional in vitro expansion of SSCs and auto transplantation after cancer treatment. This technique may restore the pool of SSCs resulting in restoration of spermatogenesis. While this technique has not been applied to humans due to its highly experimental nature and concerns of malignant contamination, animal studies have been successful. While the offspring obtained from SSCs appear to be healthy in rodent models, there is relatively little data on any genetic and epigenetic changes that occur in either the transplanted SSCs or offspring. In humans, male germ cells undergo unique and extensive chromatin and epigenetic remodeling soon after their destiny as a spermatocyte has been secured. Errors in this remodeling may cause altered genetic information to be transmitted to offspring, resulting in abnormalities. This is particularly pertinent for cancer patients as SSCs obtained from these men may have a predisposition for genetic instability even prior to starting gonadotoxic therapies. In this article, landmarks in the evolution of SSC transplantation are reviewed, along with presently known genetic, epigenetic, and imprinting abnormalities that may occur after in vitro propagation and transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27683455PMC4975189W2553563267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.