ArticleEJIFCC2013
Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: Emergence of the Solution to an Important Unmet Need.
Article in EJIFCC, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A computational solution to improve biomarker reproducibility during long-term projects.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) represents an increasing problem as the overall population ages. The identification of reliable biomarkers of AD has, therefore, become increasingly important. This is not only for risk prediction and diagnosis in order to provide appropriate care, but also to identify those patients at high risk of AD development who may be eligible for inclusion in clinical trials of novel therapies. Treatment in the early stages of the disease are urgently needed, as these are expected to yield the greatest benefits. The cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers amyloid beta (1-42), hyperphosphorylated Tau and total Tau have been most extensively evaluated. Their combination has been shown to be valuable in identifying AD patients, including those who will progress to AD among a wider group of subjects with only subjective memory complaints or in very early disease stages. While commercially available diagnostic tests for these biomarkers are available, implementation in clinical practice is associated with a number of problems, such as absorption of amyloid beta (1-42) to laboratory tubes, a high degree of batch-to-batch variation with the current test, and the lack of certified reference material. Therefore, there is a need for increased automation and implementation on routine diagnostic platforms in order to support the cost-effective and reliable introduction of the tests on a wider scale. As the use of these biomarkers in research and in clinical practice continues to expand, extensive standardisation efforts are being put in place to address the challenges associated with the use of these biomarkers. Together with the development of additional biomarkers for early and differential diagnosis, this casts good foresight to serve the needs of an increasing patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27683444PMC4975183W2566418317What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.