ArticleEJIFCC2013
Flow Cytometry in the Diagnosis of Myelodysplastic Syndromes.
Article in EJIFCC, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Laboratory Workup in the Context of New Concepts and Classification Criteria.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders. Their exact etiology is unknown. Myelodysplastic syndromes cause progressive bone marrow failure resulting in pancytopenia and refractory, transfusion-dependent anemia. One can observe typical morphological alterations in the erythroid, myeloid and/or megakaryocytic cell lineage. Blast counts may also be increased. The pathologic cells are genetically unstable, and a myelodysplastic syndrome might transform into acute myeloid leukemia. The overall survival of these diseases range between few months to around ten years. Correct diagnosis and accurate prognostic classification is essential. In the past decades several scoring systems were established beginning with the French-American-British classification to the most recent Revised International Prognostic Scoring System. In all of these classifications bone marrow morphology is still the most important factor, though nowadays the genetic aberrations and flow cytometry findings are also included. The diagnosis and prognostic classification of myelodysplastic syndromes remain a great challenge for hematologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27683426PMC4975306W2559504983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.