ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2017
Brain activation for spontaneous and explicit false belief tasks overlaps: new fMRI evidence on belief processing and violation of expectation.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relational vs representational social cognitive processing: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023Pooled it
- The Cognitive Architecture of Infant Attachment.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025Review
- Human cerebellum and social navigation: cerebello-cerebral connectivity using dynamic causal modelling.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Hierarchical surprise signals in naturalistic violation of expectations.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Unveiling the neural dynamics of the theory of mind: a fMRI study on belief processing phases.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Verbal Perceptual Prompts Facilitate Children's Sensitivity to False Beliefs.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- Understanding Female and Male Insights in Psychology: Who Thinks What?Journal of lifestyle medicine · 2024Review
- Spontaneous theory of mind in autism: are anticipatory gaze and reaction time biases consistent?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- The social roots of self development: from a bodily to an intellectual interpersonal dialogue.Psychological research · 2023Review
- The audience who knew too much: investigating the role of spontaneous theory of mind on the processing of dramatic irony scenes in film.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Theory of mind tested by implicit false belief: a simple and full-fledged mental state attribution.The FEBS journal · 2022Review
- The Role of the Posterior Cerebellum in Dysfunctional Social Sequencing.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2022Article
- Article
- Measuring spontaneous mentalizing with a ball detection task: putting the attention-check hypothesis by Phillips and colleagues (2015) to the test.Psychological research · 2020Article
- Two systems for thinking about others' thoughts in the developing brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Early interpersonal trauma reduces temporoparietal junction activity during spontaneous mentalising.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020Article
- Processing False Beliefs in Preschool Children and Adults: Developing a Set of Custom Tasks to Test the Theory of Mind in Neuroimaging and Behavioral Research.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Shared Characteristics of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks Underlying Interoceptive Awareness and Empathy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- The neural representation of mental beliefs held by two agents.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is extensive discussion on whether spontaneous and explicit forms of ToM are based on the same cognitive/neural mechanisms or rather reflect qualitatively different processes. For the first time, we analyzed the BOLD signal for false belief processing by directly comparing spontaneous and explicit ToM task versions. In both versions, participants watched videos of a scene including an agent who acquires a true or false belief about the location of an object (belief formation phase). At the end of the movies (outcome phase), participants had to react to the presence of the object. During the belief formation phase, greater activity was found for false vs true belief trials in the right posterior parietal cortex. The ROI analysis of the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), confirmed this observation. Moreover, the anterior medial prefrontal cortex (aMPFC) was active during the outcome phase, being sensitive to violation of both the participant's and agent's expectations about the location of the object. Activity in the TPJ and aMPFC was not modulated by the spontaneous/explicit task. Overall, these data show that neural mechanisms for spontaneous and explicit ToM overlap. Interestingly, a dissociation between TPJ and aMPFC for belief tracking and outcome evaluation, respectively, was also found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.