Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27683370›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Host coevolution alters the adaptive landscape of a virus.

Alita R Burmeister, Richard E Lenski, Justin R Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Coevolutionary phage training leads to greater bacterial suppression and delays the evolution of phage resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Sustained coevolution of phage Lambda andMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Pleiotropy complicates a trade-off between phage resistance and antibiotic resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Experimental Evolution of Innovation and Novelty.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Adaptation, chance, and history in experimental evolution reversals to unicellularity.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alita R BurmeisterDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA alita@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4304-5551
Richard E LenskiDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1064-8375
Justin R MeyerDivision of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5566-8452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The origin of new and complex structures and functions is fundamental for shaping the diversity of life. Such key innovations are rare because they require multiple interacting changes. We sought to understand how the adaptive landscape led to an innovation whereby bacteriophage λ evolved the new ability to exploit a receptor, OmpF, on Escherichia coli cells. Previous work showed that this ability evolved repeatedly, despite requiring four mutations in one virus gene. Here, we examine how this innovation evolved by studying six intermediate genotypes of λ isolated during independent transitions to exploit OmpF and comparing them to their ancestor. All six intermediates showed large increases in their adsorption rates on the ancestral host. Improvements in adsorption were offset, in large part, by the evolution of host resistance, which occurred by reduced expression of LamB, the usual receptor for λ. As a consequence of host coevolution, the adaptive landscape of the virus changed such that selection favouring four of the six virus intermediates became stronger after the host evolved resistance, thereby accelerating virus populations along the path to using the new OmpF receptor. This dependency of viral fitness on host genotype thus shows an important role for coevolution in the origin of the new viral function.

Indexed as

adaptive landscapecoevolutionexperimental evolutionkey innovationviruses

Identifiers

PMID27683370
PMCPMC5046904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.