Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27683282›Full record

Trial reportIndian journal of pediatrics2017

Comparison of 300,000 and 600,000 IU Oral Vitamin-D Bolus for Vitamin-D Deficiency in Young Children.

Jiyalal Harnot, Sanjay Verma, Sunit Singhi, Naveen Sankhyan, Naresh Sachdeva, Bhavneet Bharti

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Update of the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D for infants.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Hypercalcemic Disorders in Children.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiyalal HarnotDepartment of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Sanjay VermaDepartment of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India. sanjay06verma@yahoo.com.
Sunit SinghiDepartment of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Naveen SankhyanDepartment of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.
Naresh SachdevaDepartment of Endocrinology, Advanced Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Bhavneet BhartiDepartment of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatric Center, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector-12, Chandigarh, 160012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of 300,000 and 600,000 IU vitamin-D single-oral dose for the treatment of vitamin-D deficiency (VDD) in young children (3 mo - 3 y).

methodsThis double-blind randomized control trial (Clinical Trail Registration-CTRI/2012/05/002621) was conducted in the Pediatric out-patient department (OPD) at a tertiary-care referral hospital. Children (3 mo - 3 y) with clinical/radiological features suggestive of VDD were screened; those found to be having 25(OH)D below 15 ng/ml and meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria's were enrolled after taking informed consent. They were randomized into two groups, one receiving 600,000 and other 300,000 IU vitamin-D orally stat (Stoss-therapy). Primary outcome measure was proportion of children developing hypercalcemia/and hypercalciuria at day 7-10 post-therapy. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of children with hypercalciuria at day 3-5, hypercalcemia/and hypercalciuria at day 25-30 and 25(OH)D sufficiency at day 25-30 post-therapy.

resultsSixty children, 30 in each group were randomized to two study groups. Baseline variables were comparable in two groups. Primary outcome measure (proportion of children with hypercalcemia/and hypercalciuria at 7 - 10th d) were 18.5 % (5/27) in 600,000 and 10.7 % (3/28) in 300,000 IU group (P = 0.47). Secondary outcome measures were - i) Proportion of children with hypercalciuria (3-5th d) were 18.5 % (5/27) in 600,000 and 7 % (2/28) in 300,000 group (P = 0.25). ii) Proportion of children with hypercalcemia/and hypercalciuria (25-30th d) were 18.5 % (5/27) in 600,000 and 11 % (3/28) in 300,000 group (P = 0.47). iii) All children in both groups had 25(OH)D levels in sufficiency range (25-30th d). With this sample size no significant difference in any of the group could be established.

conclusionsThe superiority of 300,000 over 600,000 IU vitamin-D single-dose oral therapy for VDD in children (3 mo - 3 y) in terms of safety could not be established with this sample size, although the prevalence of hypercalcemia/and hypercalciuria was observed more with 600,000 IU group. Both the regimens were effective for treating VDD at 25-30th d post-therapy.

Indexed as

Administration, OralChild, PreschoolDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMaleTreatment OutcomeVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamin DCholecalciferolMetabolic bone diseaseRicketsStoss therapy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.