Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27683253›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2016

Relationship of specific MRI findings to treatment outcomes in patients receiving transforaminal epidural steroid injections.

Marco Lechmann, Andrea Rosskopf, Christine Ehrmann, Reto Sutter, Christian W A Pfirrmann, Cynthia K Peterson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco LechmannDepartment of Radiology, Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
Andrea RosskopfDepartment of Radiology, Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
Christine EhrmannDepartment of Radiology, Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
Reto SutterDepartment of Radiology, Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
Christian W A PfirrmannDepartment of Radiology, Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
Cynthia K PetersonDepartment of Radiology, Orthopaedic University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zürich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zürich, Switzerland. cynthia.peterson@balgrist.ch.
Universitätsklinik Balgrist · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether specific MRI findings are related to outcomes after lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) and to assess the inter-rater reliability of imaging diagnosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective outcomes study on 156 consecutive patients with 1-month follow-up outcomes data and MRI within 3 months of TFESI was conducted. Pain levels (numerical rating scale) (NRS) were recorded prior to injection. Overall 'improvement' was determined using the Patients Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale and NRS data were collected at three time points post injection. Two radiologists independently evaluated all images blinded to treatment outcome for reliability of diagnosis. The Chi-square test compared MRI findings for the senior radiologist to 'improvement'. NRS change scores were compared to MRI findings with the unpaired t-test or ANOVA. Kappa and percent agreement assessed inter-rater agreement of diagnosis.

resultsThe only abnormality linked to 'improvement' (p = 0.03) and higher NRS change scores (p = 0.0001) at 1 month was the disc herniation morphology 'protrusion + sequestration'. Patients with degeneration by osteophytes (p = 0.034), grade 3 foraminal nerve root compression (p = 0.01) and foraminal/extraforaminal location of herniation (p = 0.014) also had higher 1 month NRS change scores. Reliability of diagnosis was 'fair' to 'substantial' depending on MRI findings.

conclusionsPatients with disc protrusion plus sequestration were significantly more likely to report overall improvement and more pain reduction at 1 month. Higher pain reduction was noted in patients with degeneration by osteophytes, grade 3 foraminal nerve root compression, or foraminal/extraforaminal disc herniation location.

Indexed as

Injections, EpiduralMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain MeasurementProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSpinal StenosisSteroidsSteroidsClinical competenceEpiduralInjectionsIntraspinalTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID27683253
OpenAlexW2523876745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.