Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27683127›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

High-efficacy targeting of colon-cancer liver metastasis with Salmonella typhimurium A1-R via intra-portal-vein injection in orthotopic nude-mouse models.

Kei Kawaguchi, Takashi Murakami, Atsushi Suetsugu, Tasuku Kiyuna, Kentaro Igarashi, Yukihiko Hiroshima, Ming Zhao, Yong Zhang, Michael Bouvet, Bryan M Clary and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Analysis ofInfection and drug resistance · 2020
    Article
  7. Detection of tumors with fluoromarker-releasing bacteria.International journal of cancer · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kei KawaguchiAntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Takashi MurakamiAntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Atsushi SuetsuguAntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Tasuku KiyunaAntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Kentaro IgarashiAntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Yukihiko HiroshimaAntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Ming ZhaoAntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Yong ZhangAntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Michael BouvetDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Bryan M ClaryDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Michiaki UnnoDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Robert M HoffmanAntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
AntiCancer (United States) · USTohoku University · JPUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver metastasis is the main cause of colon cancer-related death and is a recalcitrant disease. We report here the efficacy and safety of intra-portal-vein (iPV) targeting of Salmonella typhimurium A1-R on colon cancer liver metastasis in a nude-mouse orthotopic model. Nude mice with HT29 human colon cancer cells, expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) (HT29-RFP), growing in the liver were administered S. typhimurium A1-R by either iPV (1×104 colony forming units (CFU)/100 μl) or, for comparison, intra-venous injection (iv; 5×107 CFU/100 μl). Similar amounts of bacteria were delivered to the liver with the two doses, indicating that iPV delivery is 5×103 times more efficient than iv delivery. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by tumor fluorescent area (mm2) and total fluorescence intensity. Tumor fluorescent area and fluorescence intensity highly correlated (p<0.0001). iPV treatment was more effective compared to both untreated control and iv treatment (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively with iPV treatment with S. typhimurium arresting metastatic growth). There were no significant differences in body weight between all groups. The results of this study suggest that S. typhimurium A1-R administered iPV has potential for peri-operative adjuvant treatment of colon cancer liver metastasis.

Indexed as

Salmonella Infections, AnimalSalmonella typhimuriumAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsColonic NeoplasmsHT29 CellsHumansInjections, IntravenousLiver NeoplasmsMiceMice, NudePortal VeinXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic Agentsliver metastasisnude miceorthotopicSalmonella typhimurium A1-Rtumor targeting

Identifiers

PMID27683127
PMCPMC5386670
OpenAlexW2523291176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.