Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27683000›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2016

Auditory mechanics in a bush-cricket: direct evidence of dual sound inputs in the pressure difference receiver.

Thorin Jonsson, Fernando Montealegre-Z, Carl D Soulsbury, Kate A Robson Brown, Daniel Robert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Auditory mechanics in the grig (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Auditory tuning in the bushcricket miniature hearing organ.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Tuned vibration modes in a miniature hearing organ: Insights from the bushcricket.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. A narrow ear canal reduces sound velocity to create additional acoustic inputs in a microscale insect ear.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thorin JonssonSchool of Life Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-7612
Fernando Montealegre-ZSchool of Life Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK fmontealegrez@lincoln.ac.uk.
Carl D SoulsburySchool of Life Sciences, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Green Lane, Lincoln LN6 7DL, UK.
Kate A Robson BrownImaging Lab, Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Bristol, 43 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK.
Daniel RobertSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C518522/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ear of the bush-cricket, Copiphora gorgonensis, consists of a system of paired eardrums (tympana) on each foreleg. In these insects, the ear is backed by an air-filled tube, the acoustic trachea (AT), which transfers sound from the prothoracic acoustic spiracle to the internal side of the eardrums. Both surfaces of the eardrums of this auditory system are exposed to sound, making it a directionally sensitive pressure difference receiver. A key feature of the AT is its capacity to reduce the velocity of sound propagation and alter the acoustic driving forces at the tympanum. The mechanism responsible for reduction in sound velocity in the AT remains elusive, yet it is deemed to depend on adiabatic or isothermal conditions. To investigate the biophysics of such multiple input ears, we used micro-scanning laser Doppler vibrometry and micro-computed X-ray tomography. We measured the velocity of sound propagation in the AT, the transmission gains across auditory frequencies and the time-resolved mechanical dynamics of the tympanal membranes in C. gorgonensis Tracheal sound transmission generates a gain of approximately 15 dB SPL, and a propagation velocity of ca 255 m s

Indexed as

acoustic tracheabush-cricketkatydidsound processingsound propagationtympanum

Identifiers

PMID27683000
PMCPMC5046957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.