ArticleMicrobes and environments2016
In Situ Cultivation Allows for Recovery of Bacterial Types Competitive in Their Natural Environment.
Article in Microbes and environments, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- How genomics can help unravel the evolution of endophytic fungi.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Diverse cultivation strategies are necessary to capture microbial diversity in High Arctic lake sediment.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2025Article
- Exploring microbial diversity in Greenland Ice Sheet supraglacial habitats through culturing-dependent and -independent approaches.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2023Article
- Microbial Interaction is Among the Key Factors for Isolation of Previous Uncultured Microbes.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Review
- Reaching unreachables: Obstacles and successes of microbial cultivation and their reasons.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Diluted Luria-Bertani medium vs. sewage sludge as growth media: comparison of community structure and diversity in the culturable bacteria.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Application of in situ cultivation in marine microbial resource mining.Marine life science & technology · 2021Review
- Accessing previously uncultured marine microbial resources by a combination of alternative cultivation methods.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Article
- Triggering Growth via Growth Initiation Factors in Nature: A Putative Mechanism forFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- "Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Technologies for the Selection, Culture and Metabolic Profiling of Unique Rhizosphere Microorganisms for Natural Product Discovery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard cultivation fails to grow most microorganisms, whereas in situ cultivation allows for the isolation of comparatively diverse and novel microorganisms. Information on similarities and differences in the physiological properties of isolates obtained from in situ cultivation and standard cultivation is limited. Therefore, we used the arctic sediment samples and compared two culture collections obtained using standard and novel cultivation techniques. Even though there was no temperature selection at the isolation step, isolates from each method showed different reactions to temperature. The results of the present study suggest that isolates from in situ cultivation are more competitive in their natural environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.