Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27682647›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2016

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis 20 years later: is it still a good surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis?

Gentilini Lorenzo, Coscia Maurizio, Lombardi Pietro Maria, Marta Tanzanu, Laureti Silvio, Podda Mariangela, Poggioli Gilberto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Dynamic ileal pouch emptying studies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis Complications and Pouch Failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Anxiety, depression, and inflammation after restorative proctocolectomy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis : Long-term functional results and quality of life].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gentilini LorenzoDepartment of General Surgery, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Pietro Albertoni, 40138, Bologna, Italy. lorenzo.gentilini@aosp.bo.it.
Coscia MaurizioDepartment of General Surgery, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Pietro Albertoni, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Lombardi Pietro MariaDepartment of General Surgery, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Pietro Albertoni, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Marta TanzanuDepartment of General Surgery, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Pietro Albertoni, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Laureti SilvioDepartment of General Surgery, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Pietro Albertoni, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Podda MariangelaDepartment of General Surgery, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Pietro Albertoni, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
Poggioli GilbertoDepartment of General Surgery, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Pietro Albertoni, 40138, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeShort-term results after ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) are well established; data are conflicting in long-standing patients. We retrospectively evaluated long-term complications and functional results after follow-up longer than 20 years.

methodsTwo hundred five patients with follow-up longer than 20 years have been identified out of 1112 IPAA performed in our institution; of these, 20 cases were lost at follow-up or decline to take part at the study. We evaluated long-term complications and failure rate also according to changes in histological diagnosis. Changes in functional results and quality of life (QoL) were analyzed at 5 and 20 years after IPAA.

resultsPouch failure rate was 10.8 % (35 % due to misdiagnosed Crohn). Incidences of fistulas, anastomotic stenosis, chronic pouchitis, and pre-pouch ileitis were 17.3, 12.9, 28.6, and 7.6 %, respectively. Most of the patients reported good functional outcomes. Day-time evacuations at 5 and after 20 years were 4.3 and 4.8 (p = n.s.) while during night-time were 0.8 and 1.2 (p < 0.05). Urgency was 6 and 9.4 % (p = n.s.), respectively; need of antimotility drugs was 16 and 35 % (p < 0.001). Dietary limitations and work restrictions were similar over time. Only sexuality got worse during follow-up. Satisfaction for surgery was always high and it did not change over time.

conclusionIPAA is still an excellent surgical option for UC with a low rate of pouch failure even after more than 20 years. Despite a slight worsening of functional results over time, the QoL remained high and most patients expressed satisfaction with the procedure and were willing to recommend it to others.

Indexed as

Colonic PouchesAdolescentAdultAgedAnal CanalAnastomosis, SurgicalChildColitis, UlcerativeFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProctocolectomy, RestorativeQuality of LifeTime FactorsYoung AdultCrohnFistulasPouchPouchitisRestorative proctocolectomyUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID27682647
OpenAlexW2525683173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.