ArticleGene therapy2017
Differences in vector-genome processing and illegitimate integration of non-integrating lentiviral vectors.
Article in Gene therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Safety and efficiency modifications of SIV-based integrase-defective lentiviral vectors for immunization.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021Article
- Lentiviral Vectors for T Cell Engineering: Clinical Applications, Bioprocessing and Future Perspectives.Viruses · 2021Review
- Review
- Genome Editing for CNS Disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- The IS2 Element Improves Transcription Efficiency of Integration-Deficient Lentiviral Vector Episomes.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2018Article
- Improving the Transduction of Bone Marrow-Derived Cells with an Integrase-Defective Lentiviral Vector.Human gene therapy methods · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A variety of mutations in lentiviral vector expression systems have been shown to generate a non-integrating phenotype. We studied a novel 12 base-pair U3-long terminal repeats (LTR) integrase (IN) attachment site deletion (U3-LTR att site) mutant and found similar physical titers to the previously reported IN catalytic core mutant IN/D116N. Both mutations led to a greater than two log reduction in vector integration; with IN/D116N providing lower illegitimate integration frequency, whereas the U3-LTR att site mutant provided a higher level of transgene expression. The improved expression of the U3-LTR att site mutant could not be explained solely based on an observed modest increase in integration frequency. In evaluating processing, we noted significant differences in unintegrated vector forms, with the U3-LTR att site mutant leading to a predominance of 1-LTR circles. The mutations also differed in the manner of illegitimate integration. The U3-LTR att site mutant vector demonstrated IN-mediated integration at the intact U5-LTR att site and non-IN-mediated integration at the mutated U3-LTR att site. Finally, we combined a variety of mutations and modifications and assessed transgene expression and integration frequency to show that combining modifications can improve the potential clinical utility of non-integrating lentiviral vectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.