Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27682273›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2017

Exploring Couples' Processes of Change in the Context of SASA!, a Violence Against Women and HIV Prevention Intervention in Uganda.

Elizabeth Starmann, Martine Collumbien, Nambusi Kyegombe, Karen Devries, Lori Michau, Tina Musuya, Charlotte Watts, Lori Heise

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review: Infidelity, Romantic Jealousy and Intimate Partner Violence against Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth StarmannLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. elizabeth.starmann@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4735-6269
Martine CollumbienLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nambusi KyegombeLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Karen DevriesLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lori MichauRaising Voices, Kampala, Uganda.
Tina MusuyaCenter for Domestic Violence Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Charlotte WattsLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lori HeiseLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCenter for Domestic Violence Prevention · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is now a growing body of research indicating that prevention interventions can reduce intimate partner violence (IPV); much less is known, however, about how couples exposed to these interventions experience the change process, particularly in low-income countries. Understanding the dynamic process that brings about the cessation of IPV is essential for understanding how interventions work (or don't) to reduce IPV. This study aimed to provide a better understanding of how couples' involvement with SASA!-a violence against women and HIV-related community mobilisation intervention developed by Raising Voices in Uganda-influenced processes of change in relationships. Qualitative data were collected from each partner in separate in-depth interviews following the intervention. Dyadic analysis was conducted using framework analysis methods. Study findings suggest that engagement with SASA! contributed to varied experiences and degrees of change at the individual and relationship levels. Reflection around healthy relationships and communication skills learned through SASA! activities or community activists led to more positive interaction among many couples, which reduced conflict and IPV. This nurtured a growing trust and respect between many partners, facilitating change in longstanding conflicts and generating greater intimacy and love as well as increased partnership among couples to manage economic challenges. This study draws attention to the value of researching and working with both women, men and couples to prevent IPV and suggests IPV prevention interventions may benefit from the inclusion of relationship skills building and support within the context of community mobilisation interventions.

Indexed as

Community NetworksHealth PromotionSexual PartnersAdultDomestic ViolenceFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUgandaCommunity mobilisationPartner violenceRelationship changeSASA!Violence against women

Identifiers

PMID27682273
PMCPMC5243896
OpenAlexW2526135325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.