Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27682236›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2016

Implementing goals of care conversations with veterans in VA long-term care setting: a mixed methods protocol.

Anne E Sales, Mary Ersek, Orna K Intrator, Cari Levy, Joan G Carpenter, Robert Hogikyan, Helen C Kales, Zach Landis-Lewis, Tobie Olsan, Susan C Miller and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prospective application of implementation science theories and frameworks to inform use of PROMs in routine clinical care within an integrated pain network.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Implementation Science Training and Resources for Nurses and Nurse Scientists.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anne E SalesCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. salesann@umich.edu.
Mary ErsekCorporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Orna K IntratorCanandaigua VAMC, Canandaigua, NY, USA.
Cari LevyEastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO, USA.
Joan G CarpenterCorporal Michael J. Crescenz VAMC, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert HogikyanCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Helen C KalesCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Zach Landis-LewisCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Tobie OlsanCanandaigua VAMC, Canandaigua, NY, USA.
Susan C MillerBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Marcos MontagniniCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Vyjeyanthi S PeriyakoilVA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sheri RederPuget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA IP1 HX001980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe program "Implementing Goals of Care Conversations with Veterans in VA LTC Settings" is proposed in partnership with the US Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Center for Ethics in Health Care and the Geriatrics and Extended Care Program Offices, together with the VA Office of Nursing Services. The three projects in this program are designed to support a new system-wide mandate requiring providers to conduct and systematically record conversations with veterans about their preferences for care, particularly life-sustaining treatments. These treatments include cardiac resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, and other forms of life support. However, veteran preferences for care go beyond whether or not they receive life-sustaining treatments to include issues such as whether or not they want to be hospitalized if they are acutely ill, and what kinds of comfort care they would like to receive.

methodsThree projects, all focused on improving the provision of veteran-centered care, are proposed. The projects will be conducted in Community Living Centers (VA-owned nursing homes) and VA Home-Based Primary Care programs in five regional networks in the Veterans Health Administration. In all the projects, we will use data from context and barrier and facilitator assessments to design feedback reports for staff to help them understand how well they are meeting the requirement to have conversations with veterans about their preferences and to document them appropriately. We will also use learning collaboratives-meetings in which staff teams come together and problem-solve issues they encounter in how to get veterans' preferences expressed and documented, and acted on-to support action planning to improve performance. DISCUSSION: We will use data over time to track implementation success, measured as the proportions of veterans in Community Living Centers (CLCs) and Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) who have a documented goals of care conversation soon after admission. We will work with our operational partners to spread approaches that work throughout the Veterans Health Administration.

Indexed as

CommunicationGoalsPatient Care PlanningVeteransHumansLong-Term CarePatient ParticipationProgram EvaluationResearch DesignUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans HealthFeedback interventionsGoals of care conversationsImplementation scienceLearning collaborativesLong-term care

Identifiers

PMID27682236
PMCPMC5041212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.