ArticleImplementation science : IS2016
Implementing goals of care conversations with veterans in VA long-term care setting: a mixed methods protocol.
Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2017Pooled it
- Implementation strategies for hospital-based probiotic administration in a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design for preventing hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection.BMC health services research · 2023Trial
- Life-sustaining treatment decisions and family evaluations of end-of-life care for Veteran decedents in Department of Veterans Affairs nursing homes.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024Article
- Contextual Determinants of Time to Surgery for Patients With Hip Fracture.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Randomized controlled trial of tailored audit with feedback in VHA long-term care settings.Implementation science communications · 2023Article
- Evaluating implementation strategies to support documentation of veterans' care preferences.Health services research · 2022Article
- Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through Enhanced Decision-Making (PERSIVED): a protocol for an implementation study in the Veterans Health Administration.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Postacute care outcomes in home health or skilled nursing facilities in patients with a diagnosis of dementia.Health services research · 2022Article
- Stroke thrombolysis in a middle-income country: A case study exploring the determinants of its implementation.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Applying the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework to inform implementation of the Preferences Elicited and Respected for Seriously Ill Veterans through enhanced decision-making program in the United States Veterans Health Administration.Frontiers in health services · 2022Article
- Prospective application of implementation science theories and frameworks to inform use of PROMs in routine clinical care within an integrated pain network.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Visual process maps to support implementation efforts: a case example.Implementation science communications · 2020Article
- Article
- Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: Early Implementation Results of a National Veterans Affairs Program to Honor Veterans' Care Preferences.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Observational
- Masculinity and Military Culture in VA Hospice and Palliative Care: A Narrative Review With Clinical Recommendations.Journal of palliative care · 2020Review
- Designing clinical practice feedback reports: three steps illustrated in Veterans Health Affairs long-term care facilities and programs.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Implementation Science Training and Resources for Nurses and Nurse Scientists.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2020Review
- Designing an intervention to improve sexual health service use among university undergraduate students: a mixed methods study guided by the behaviour change wheel.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Partnership to Enhance Resident Outcomes for Community Living Center Residents With Dementia: Description of the Protocol and Preliminary Findings.Journal of gerontological nursing · 2019Article
- Barriers and enablers to sexual health service use among university students: a qualitative descriptive study using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model.BMC health services research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe program "Implementing Goals of Care Conversations with Veterans in VA LTC Settings" is proposed in partnership with the US Veterans Health Administration (VA) National Center for Ethics in Health Care and the Geriatrics and Extended Care Program Offices, together with the VA Office of Nursing Services. The three projects in this program are designed to support a new system-wide mandate requiring providers to conduct and systematically record conversations with veterans about their preferences for care, particularly life-sustaining treatments. These treatments include cardiac resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, and other forms of life support. However, veteran preferences for care go beyond whether or not they receive life-sustaining treatments to include issues such as whether or not they want to be hospitalized if they are acutely ill, and what kinds of comfort care they would like to receive.
methodsThree projects, all focused on improving the provision of veteran-centered care, are proposed. The projects will be conducted in Community Living Centers (VA-owned nursing homes) and VA Home-Based Primary Care programs in five regional networks in the Veterans Health Administration. In all the projects, we will use data from context and barrier and facilitator assessments to design feedback reports for staff to help them understand how well they are meeting the requirement to have conversations with veterans about their preferences and to document them appropriately. We will also use learning collaboratives-meetings in which staff teams come together and problem-solve issues they encounter in how to get veterans' preferences expressed and documented, and acted on-to support action planning to improve performance. DISCUSSION: We will use data over time to track implementation success, measured as the proportions of veterans in Community Living Centers (CLCs) and Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) who have a documented goals of care conversation soon after admission. We will work with our operational partners to spread approaches that work throughout the Veterans Health Administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.