Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27682181›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Quantitative lateral flow strip assays as User-Friendly Tools To Detect Biomarker Profiles For Leprosy.

Anouk van Hooij, Elisa M Tjon Kon Fat, Renate Richardus, Susan J F van den Eeden, Louis Wilson, Claudia J de Dood, Roel Faber, Korshed Alam, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Paul L A M Corstjens and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Anti-phenolic glycolipid antibodies inOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular and Serological Surveillance forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Engineering Innovative Interfaces for Point-of-Care Diagnostics.Current opinion in colloid & interface science · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anouk van HooijDept. of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Elisa M Tjon Kon FatDept. Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Renate RichardusDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Susan J F van den EedenDept. of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Louis WilsonDept. of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Claudia J de DoodDept. Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Roel FaberDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Korshed AlamRural Health Program, The Leprosy Mission International Bangladesh, Nilphamari, Bangladesh.
Jan Hendrik RichardusDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul L A M CorstjensDept. Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Annemieke GelukDept. of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leprosy is a debilitating, infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae. Despite the availability of multidrug therapy, transmission is unremitting. Thus, early identification of M. leprae infection is essential to reduce transmission. The immune response to M. leprae is determined by host genetics, resulting in paucibacillary (PB) and multibacillary (MB) leprosy associated with dominant cellular or humoral immunity, respectively. This spectral pathology of leprosy compels detection of immunity to M. leprae to be based on multiple, diverse biomarkers. In this study we have applied quantitative user friendly lateral flow assays (LFAs) for four immune markers (anti-PGL-I antibodies, IL-10, CCL4 and IP-10) for whole blood samples from a longitudinal BCG vaccination field-trial in Bangladesh. Different biomarker profiles, in contrast to single markers, distinguished M. leprae infected from non-infected test groups, patients from household contacts (HHC) and endemic controls (EC), or MB from PB patients. The test protocol presented in this study merging detection of innate, adaptive cellular as well as humoral immunity, thus provides a convenient tool to measure specific biomarker profiles for M. leprae infection and leprosy utilizing a field-friendly technology.

Identifiers

PMID27682181
PMCPMC5041085
OpenAlexW2523927196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.