Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27682091›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2015

Temporal Study of the Microbial Diversity of the North Arm of Great Salt Lake, Utah, U.S.

Swati Almeida-Dalmet, Masoumeh Sikaroodi, Patrick M Gillevet, Carol D Litchfield, Bonnie K Baxter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Great Salt Lake microbiology: a historical perspective.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2018
    Review
  15. Water Bacterial and Fungal Community Compositions Associated with Urban Lakes, Xi'an, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Swati Almeida-DalmetMicrobiome Analysis Center, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, 10900 University Blvd., Manassas, VA 20110, USA. sdalmet@gmu.edu.
Masoumeh SikaroodiMicrobiome Analysis Center, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, 10900 University Blvd., Manassas, VA 20110, USA. msikaroo@gmu.edu.
Patrick M GillevetMicrobiome Analysis Center, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, 10900 University Blvd., Manassas, VA 20110, USA. pgilleve@gmu.edu.
Carol D LitchfieldMicrobiome Analysis Center, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, 10900 University Blvd., Manassas, VA 20110, USA. gslinstitute@westminstercollege.edu.
Bonnie K BaxterGreat Salt Lake Institute, Westminster College, 1840 South 1300 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84105, USA. bbaxter@westminstercollege.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We employed a temporal sampling approach to understand how the microbial diversity may shift in the north arm of Great Salt Lake, Utah, U.S. To determine how variations in seasonal environmental factors affect microbial communities, length heterogeneity PCR fingerprinting was performed using consensus primers for the domain Bacteria, and the haloarchaea. The archaeal fingerprints showed similarities during 2003 and 2004, but this diversity changed during the remaining two years of the study, 2005 and 2006. We also performed molecular phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA genes of the whole microbial community to characterize the taxa in the samples. Our results indicated that in the domain, Bacteria, the Salinibacter group dominated the populations in all samplings. However, in the case of Archaea, as noted by LIBSHUFF for phylogenetic relatedness analysis, many of the temporal communities were distinct from each other, and changes in community composition did not track with environmental parameters. Around 20-23 different phylotypes, as revealed by rarefaction, predominated at different periods of the year. Some phylotypes, such as Haloquadradum, were present year-round although they changed in their abundance in different samplings, which may indicate that these species are affected by biotic factors, such as nutrients or viruses, that are independent of seasonal temperature dynamics.

Indexed as

biotechnologyenzymesgeneticshaloarchaeahalophile: ecologymolecular phylogeny and molecular biologyphylogenytaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID27682091
PMCPMC5023243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.