Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27682072›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2016

How anorexia nervosa patients with high and low autistic traits respond to group Cognitive Remediation Therapy.

Kate Tchanturia, Emma Larsson, James Adamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparing executive functions profiles in anorexia nervosa and autism spectrum disorder in adolescence.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Article
  15. A comparison of the eating disorder service experiences of autistic and non-autistic women in the UK.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Article
  16. Association of autism diagnosis and polygenic scores with eating disorder severity.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Article
  17. Problematic eating behaviours of autistic women-A scoping review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Article
  18. Sensory wellbeing workshops for inpatient and day-care patients with anorexia nervosa.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kate TchanturiaKing's College London, Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK. kate.tchanturia@kcl.ac.uk.
Emma LarssonKing's College London, Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
James AdamsonEating Disorders Unit, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Beckenham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current study aimed to evaluate group Cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) inpatients with Anorexia Nervosa (AN). We aimed to examine the treatment response of group CRT in AN patients with high or low levels of autistic traits.

methodsThirty-five in patients with an AN diagnosis received group CRT intervention for 6 sessions in a national eating disorder unit. All participants completed self-report questionnaires on thinking styles and motivation before and after the intervention.

resultsPatients with low autistic traits had statistically significant medium size effect improvements in self-reported thinking style scales as well as confidence (ability) to change. Patients with high autistic traits showed no statistically significant improvements in any outcome measure.

conclusionsThe brief group format CRT intervention improves self-reported cognitive and motivational aspects in people with AN without autistic traits. For patients with higher autistic traits brief group CRT does not improve self-reported cognitive style or motivation. This finding suggests that brief group format CRT might not be the best suited format for individuals with elevated autistic traits and individual or more tailored CRT should be explored.

Indexed as

Anorexia nervosaAutism spectrum disordersCentral coherenceCognitive flexibilityCRTGroup therapy

Identifiers

PMID27682072
PMCPMC5041290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.