Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27681955›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2018

Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study.

Luis Eduardo Juárez-Orozco, Erick Alexanderson, Rudi A Dierckx, Hendrikus H Boersma, Johannes L Hillege, Clark J Zeebregts, Myriam M Martínez-Aguilar, Antonio Jordán-Ríos, Ana Gabriela Ayala-German, Niek Prakken and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The diagnostic value of SPECT CZT quantitative myocardial blood flow in high-risk patients.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A perfect tool for comprehensive evaluation of myocardial perfusion and function: Stress PET imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Ventricular synchrony is not significantly determined by absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with chronic heart failure: AJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Software reproducibility of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve quantification in ischemic heart disease: AJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  8. Phase analysis of gated PET in the evaluation of mechanical ventricular synchrony: A narrative overview.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Left ventricular function during hyperemia: A dive into the unknown.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  12. Myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve values inEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis Eduardo Juárez-OrozcoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Erick AlexandersonDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología "Ignacio Chávez", Juan Badiano #1 Col. Sección XVI Del. Tlalpan, C.P 14080, Mexico City, Mexico. erickalexandersonmd@gmail.com.
Rudi A DierckxDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hendrikus H BoersmaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Johannes L HillegeDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Clark J ZeebregtsDepartment of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Myriam M Martínez-AguilarPET/CT Unit, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Antonio Jordán-RíosMexican Faculty of Medicine, La Salle University, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ana Gabriela Ayala-GermanPET/CT Unit, Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Niek PrakkenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rene A TioDepartment of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Riemer H SlartDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLInstituto Nacional de Cardiología · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversidad La Salle · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac PET quantifies stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), while ECG-gated datasets can measure components of ventricular function simultaneously. Stress MBF seems to outperform MPR in the detection of significant CAD. However, it is uncertain which perfusion measurement is more related to ventricular function. We hypothesized that stress MBF correlates with ventricular function better than MPR in patients studied for suspected myocardial ischemia.

methodsWe studied 248 patients referred to a rest and adenosine-stress Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET. We performed a multivariate analysis using systolic function (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF), diastolic function (mean filling rate in diastole, MFR/3), and synchrony (Entropy) as the outcome variables, and stress MBF, MPR, and relevant covariates as the predictors. Secondarily, we repeated the analysis for the subgroup of patients with and without a previous myocardial infarction (MI).

results166 male and 82 female patients (mean age 63 ± 11 and 67 ± 11 year, respectively) were included. 60% of the patients presented hypertension, 57% dyslipidemia, 21% type 2 diabetes mellitus, 45% smoking, and 34.7% a previous MI. Mean stress MBF was 1.99 ± 0.75 mL/g/min, MPR = 2.55 ± 0.89, LVEF = 61.6 ± 15%, MFR/3 = 1.12 ± 0.38 EDV/s, and Entropy = 45.6 ± 11.3%. There was a significant correlation between stress MBF (P < .001) and ventricular function. This was stronger than the one for MPR (P = .063). Sex, age, diabetes, and extent of previous MI were also significant predictors. Results were similar for the analyses of the 2 subgroups.

conclusionStress MBF is better correlated with ventricular function than MPR, as evaluated by Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET, independently from other relevant cardiovascular risk factors and clinical covariates. This relationship between coronary vasodilatory capacity and ventricular function is sustained across groups with and without a previous MI.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedAmmoniaCoronary CirculationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaNitrogen RadioisotopesRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAmmoniaNitrogen-13Nitrogen Radioisotopescoronary artery diseasemyocardial perfusion reservePETstress myocardial blood flowventricular function

Identifiers

PMID27681955
PMCPMC5966471
OpenAlexW2523767203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.