ReviewMicroorganisms2016
Adhesion Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria on Intestinal Mucin.
Review in Microorganisms, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
83 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Article
- GABA-Producing Bacteria as Potential Psychobiotics in Gut-Brain Axis Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Science behind Probiotics: Exploring their Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Induction of Human β-Defensin-2 by VaginalOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Non-specific Protein and Peptide Antibacterial Factors of Mammals.The protein journal · 2026Review
- Gut and faecal microbiota alterations in mice following infection with Arcobacter butzleri strains from a food processing plant.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characterization of Biofilm-Forming Lactic Acid Bacteria from Traditional Fermented Foods and Their Probiotic Potential.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Functional and Genomic Analysis ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial and Anticancer Activities ofNutrients · 2025Article
- Comparative Genome Analysis and Characterization of the Probiotic Properties of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from the Gastrointestinal Tract of Wild Boars in the Czech Republic.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- High-resolution fecal pharmacokinetic modeling in mice with orally administered antibiotics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the Impact of Olive-Derived Bioactive Components on Gut Microbiota: Implications for Digestive Health.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements and Challenges in Modeling Mechanobiology in Intestinal Host-Microbiota Interaction.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Review
- Genomic and Phenotypic Insight into the Probiotic Potential of Lactic Acid Bacterial spp. Associated with the Human Gut Mucosa.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- Distinct effects of mucin on phage-host interactions in model systems of beneficial and pathogenic bacteria.Archives of virology · 2025Article
- Dynamics of gut colonization by commensal and pathogenic bacteria that attach to the intestinal epithelium.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Lactic Acid Bacteria from Northern Thai (Lanna) Fermented Foods: A Promising Source of Probiotics with Applications in Synbiotic Formulation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Qualification of the human Reconstructed Intestine Micronuclei Cytome assay for site-of-contact genotoxic hazard identification.NAM journal · 2025Article
- Sodium oligomannate disrupts the adherence of RibCell discovery · 2024Article
23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are Gram-positive bacteria that are natural inhabitants of the gastrointestinal (GI) tracts of mammals, including humans. Since Mechnikov first proposed that yogurt could prevent intestinal putrefaction and aging, the beneficial effects of LAB have been widely demonstrated. The region between the duodenum and the terminal of the ileum is the primary region colonized by LAB, particularly the Lactobacillus species, and this region is covered by a mucus layer composed mainly of mucin-type glycoproteins. The mucus layer plays a role in protecting the intestinal epithelial cells against damage, but is also considered to be critical for the adhesion of Lactobacillus in the GI tract. Consequently, the adhesion exhibited by lactobacilli on mucin has attracted attention as one of the critical factors contributing to the persistent beneficial effects of Lactobacillus in a constantly changing intestinal environment. Thus, understanding the interactions between Lactobacillus and mucin is crucial for elucidating the survival strategies of LAB in the GI tract. This review highlights the properties of the interactions between Lactobacillus and mucin, while concomitantly considering the structure of the GI tract from a histochemical perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.