ReviewMicroorganisms2016
Biofilm Forming Lactobacillus: New Challenges for the Development of Probiotics.
Review in Microorganisms, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
144 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of probiotic therapy on clinical parameters and human immune response in peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical studies.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Biodiversity of NSLAB in Traditional Serbian Cheeses and Stepwise Functional Characterization of Selected AutochthonousFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identification ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- In vitro characterization of probiotic properties of isolated and grown co-cultures on halophyte-based substrate.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
- In Vivo and In Vitro Evaluation of Probiotic and Postbiotic Strategies Against Foulbrood in Honeybees.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Probiotics and Antibiotics: From Empirical Practice to a Biological Rationale for Targeted Choice During Antibiotic Therapy.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Review
- Novel Skin- and Oral-Derived Probiotic Candidates: Functional Evaluation and Application Perspectives.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Prophylactic oral Limosilactobacillus fermentum DSM 34872 protects Galleria mellonella from gut-associated pathogens.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- A Biofilm-StateMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Biofilm state Limosilactobacillus reuteri modulates aryl hydrocarbon receptor activity and suppresses experimental necrotizing enterocolitis.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- WGS analysis and functional studies illustrate promising gene-signatures for probiotic attributes and molecular-targeted therapeutic prospects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP-ARP2.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- In Vitro and In Silico Assessment of the Probiotic and Technological Potential of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus MW019593 Isolated from Algerian Cow's Milk.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Kynurenine pathway in Parkinson's disease: pathophysiological roles and therapeutic interventions.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Characterization of Biofilm-Forming Lactic Acid Bacteria from Traditional Fermented Foods and Their Probiotic Potential.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- 3D-Bioprinted Urinary Catheters Enable Sustained Probiotic Recovery Under Flow and Improve Bladder Colonization In Vivo.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2025Article
- Exploring the role of gut microbiota in antibiotic resistance and prevention.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Polydopamine-chitosan coated biofilm-stateMaterials today. Bio · 2025Article
84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Probiotics are live bacteria, generally administered in food, conferring beneficial effects to the host because they help to prevent or treat diseases, the majority of which are gastrointestinal. Numerous investigations have verified the beneficial effect of probiotic strains in biofilm form, including increased resistance to temperature, gastric pH and mechanical forces to that of their planktonic counterparts. In addition, the development of new encapsulation technologies, which have exploited the properties of biofilms in the creation of double coated capsules, has given origin to fourth generation probiotics. Up to now, reviews have focused on the detrimental effects of biofilms associated with pathogenic bacteria. Therefore, this work aims to amalgamate information describing the biofilms of Lactobacillus strains which are used as probiotics, particularly L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, L. reuteri, and L. fermentum. Additionally, we have reviewed the development of probiotics using technology inspired by biofilms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.