Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27681905›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2016

The Opportunity for High-Performance Biomaterials from Methane.

Peter James Strong, Bronwyn Laycock, Syarifah Nuraqmar Syed Mahamud, Paul Douglas Jensen, Paul Andrew Lant, Gene Tyson, Steven Pratt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Poly-β-hydroxybutyrate Production byIranian journal of biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  20. Adaptive Strategies ofIndian journal of microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter James StrongCentre for Solid Waste Bioprocessing, School of Civil Engineering and School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. PJStrong@gmail.com.
Bronwyn LaycockSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. b.laycock@uq.edu.au.
Syarifah Nuraqmar Syed MahamudSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. aqmar.syedmahamud@uq.edu.au.
Paul Douglas JensenAdvanced Water Management Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. p.jensen@awmc.uq.edu.au.
Paul Andrew LantSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. paul.lant@uq.edu.au.
Gene TysonAustralian Centre for Ecogenomics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. g.tyson@uq.edu.au.
Steven PrattSchool of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. s.pratt@uq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) biopolymers are widely recognised as outstanding candidates to replace conventional petroleum-derived polymers. Their mechanical properties are good and can be tailored through copolymer composition, they are biodegradable, and unlike many alternatives, they do not rely on oil-based feedstocks. Further, they are the only commodity polymer that can be synthesised intracellularly, ensuring stereoregularity and high molecular weight. However, despite offering enormous potential for many years, they are still not making a significant impact. This is broadly because commercial uptake has been limited by variable performance (inconsistent polymer properties) and high production costs of the raw polymer. Additionally, the main type of PHA produced naturally is poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB), which has limited scope due to its brittle nature and low thermal stability, as well as its tendency to embrittle over time. Production cost is strongly impacted by the type of the feedstock used. In this article we consider: the production of PHAs from methanotrophs using methane as a cost-effective substrate; the use of mixed cultures, as opposed to pure strains; and strategies to generate a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) copolymer (PHBV), which has more desirable qualities such as toughness and elasticity.

Indexed as

biopolymergas fermentationmethanePHAPHBPHBVsyngas methanotroph

Identifiers

PMID27681905
PMCPMC5029516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.