Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27681742›Full record

ArticleMicroarrays (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Automated and Multiplexed Soft Lithography for the Production of Low-Density DNA Microarrays.

Julie Fredonnet, Julie Foncy, Jean-Christophe Cau, Childérick Séverac, Jean Marie François, Emmanuelle Trévisiol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microarrays (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. PhotocleavableChemical reviews · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Innovative DendrisChipsDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie FredonnetITAV, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse 31000, France. julie.fredonnet@toulouse.inra.fr.
Julie FoncyITAV, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse 31000, France. julie.foncy@laas.fr.
Jean-Christophe CauInnospys SAS, 3, allée des Vignes, Carbonne 31390, France. jc-cau@innopsys.fr.
Childérick SéveracITAV, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse 31000, France. childerick.severac@itav.fr.
Jean Marie FrançoisITAV, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse 31000, France. fran_jm@insa-toulouse.fr.
Emmanuelle TrévisiolITAV, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse 31000, France. emmanuelle.trevisiol@laas.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarrays are established research tools for genotyping, expression profiling, or molecular diagnostics in which DNA molecules are precisely addressed to the surface of a solid support. This study assesses the fabrication of low-density oligonucleotide arrays using an automated microcontact printing device, the InnoStamp 40(®). This automate allows a multiplexed deposition of oligoprobes on a functionalized surface by the use of a MacroStamp(TM) bearing 64 individual pillars each mounted with 50 circular micropatterns (spots) of 160 µm diameter at 320 µm pitch. Reliability and reuse of the MacroStamp(TM) were shown to be fast and robust by a simple washing step in 96% ethanol. The low-density microarrays printed on either epoxysilane or dendrimer-functionalized slides (DendriSlides) showed excellent hybridization response with complementary sequences at unusual low probe and target concentrations, since the actual probe density immobilized by this technology was at least 10-fold lower than with the conventional mechanical spotting. In addition, we found a comparable hybridization response in terms of fluorescence intensity between spotted and printed oligoarrays with a 1 nM complementary target by using a 50-fold lower probe concentration to produce the oligoarrays by the microcontact printing method. Taken together, our results lend support to the potential development of this multiplexed microcontact printing technology employing soft lithography as an alternative, cost-competitive tool for fabrication of low-density DNA microarrays.

Indexed as

automationdedicated microarrayshybridizationmicrocontact printingmultiplexingsoft lithography

Identifiers

PMID27681742
PMCPMC5197944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.