ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2017
Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.
Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions May Reveal Damage to Outer Hair Cells Caused by Exposure to Recreational Noise: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Sources of Microstructure in Mammalian Cochlear Responses.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Review
- Swept Along: Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions Using Continuously Varying Stimuli.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Review
- Differential cortical activation patterns: pioneering sub-classification of tinnitus with and without hyperacusis by combining audiometry, gamma oscillations, and hemodynamics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.Hearing research · 2019Article
- Efferent-induced alterations in distortion and reflection otoacoustic emissions in children.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017Article
- Characterizing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions across the human lifespan.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2017Article
- Objective Assessment System for Hearing Prediction Based on Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The characteristics of human otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) have not been thoroughly examined above the standard audiometric frequency range (>8 kHz). This is despite the fact that deterioration of cochlear function often starts at the basal, high-frequency end of the cochlea before progressing apically. Here, stimulus-frequency OAEs (SFOAEs) were obtained from 0.5 to 20 kHz in 23 young, audiometrically normal female adults and three individuals with abnormal audiograms, using a low-to-moderate probe level of 36 dB forward pressure level (FPL). In audiometrically normal ears, SFOAEs were measurable at frequencies approaching the start of the steeply sloping high-frequency portion of the audiogram (∼12-15 kHz), though their amplitudes often declined substantially above ∼7 kHz, rarely exceeding 0 dB SPL above 8 kHz. This amplitude decline was typically abrupt and occurred at a frequency that was variable across subjects and not strongly related to the audiogram. In contrast, certain ears with elevated mid-frequency thresholds but regions of normal high-frequency sensitivity could possess surprisingly large SFOAEs (>10 dB SPL) above 7 kHz. When also measured, distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs) usually remained stronger at higher stimulus frequencies and mirrored the audiogram more closely than SFOAEs. However, the high-frequency extent of SFOAE and DPOAE responses was similar when compared as a function of the response frequency, suggesting that middle ear transmission may be a common limiting factor at high frequencies. Nevertheless, cochlear factors are more likely responsible for complexities observed in high-frequency SFOAE spectra, such as abrupt amplitude changes and narrowly defined response peaks above 10 kHz, as well as the large responses in abnormal ears. These factors may include altered cochlear reflectivity due to subtle damage or the reduced spatial extent of the SFOAE generation region at the cochlear base. The use of higher probe levels is necessary to further evaluate the characteristics and potential utility of high-frequency SFOAE measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.