Proteolytic activity in some freshwater animals and associated microflora in a wide pH range.

V V Kuz'mina, G V Zolotareva, V A Sheptitskiy

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

V V Kuz'minaI.D.Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS, PO Box 152742, Borok, Yaroslavl, Russia.

G V ZolotarevaT.G. Shevchenko State University, PO Box 3300, Tiraspol, Moldova. zolotariova_g_v@mail.ru.

V A SheptitskiyT.G. Shevchenko State University, PO Box 3300, Tiraspol, Moldova.

Shevchenko Transnistria State University · MDInstitute of Biology of Inland Waters named Ivan Dmitrievich Papanin · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteolytic activity in some freshwater animals (crustacean plankton, sandhopper Amphipoda sp., larvae of chironomids Chironomus sp., oligochaetes Oligohaeta sp., dreissena Dreissena polymorpha, roach Rutilus rutilus heckelii, rudd Scardinius erythrophthalmus, ruff Acerina cernua, and monkey goby Neogobius fluviatilis) prevailing within the food of fishes of various ecological groups as well as in their associated microflora in a wide pH range was investigated. It has been shown that the optimum pH of proteases in the animals' whole organism varies: 6.0 for sandhopper; 8.0 for chironomid larvae, oligochaetes, monkey goby, and ruff; 8.0-9.0 for zooplankton; and 10.0 for roach and rudd. The optimum pH of associated microflora proteases is 6.0 for monkey goby; 7.0 for sandhopper and roach and ruff ; 8.0-9.0 for oligochaetes; 9.0 for zooplankton; and 10.0 for chironomid larvae and rudd. The compensatory role of food items and enteric microbiota proteases in digestive processes in fish of different ecological groups at low pH is discussed.

Indexed as

ProteolysisAmphipodaAnimalsChironomidaeDietDreissenaFishesFood ChainFresh WaterHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationOligochaetaPlanktonAssociated microfloraDigestionFreshwater animalspHPotential preysProteases

Identifiers

PMID27681591

DOI10.1007/s10695-016-0293-4

OpenAlexW2526994842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.