ArticleCritical care medicine2017
Benchmarking Sepsis Gene Expression Diagnostics Using Public Data.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Collection of Clinical Specimens From Volunteers for Assay Development
TriVerity in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Infections and Suspected Sepsis
Sepsis Prognosis and Diagnosis in the Emergency Department Using a Host Response Classifier (SPEED) UK - a Multi-Centre Observational Study
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Host-response-based gene signatures for tuberculosis diagnosis: A systematic comparison of 16 signatures.PLoS medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Single-cell transcriptomics reveals pathogen-specific monocyte heterogeneity and potential biomarkers in gram-positive versus gram-negative bloodstream infections.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Blood Host-Response mRNA Assays in Adult Acute Care: Diagnostic Performance, Translational Evidence, and the Clinical Implementation Gap.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Article
- Compact RNA sensors for increasingly complex functions of multiple inputs.Nature chemistry · 2025Article
- Cytosolic nucleic acid sensing as driver of critical illness: mechanisms and advances in therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Exploring Core Genes Associated with Sepsis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Using Single-Cell Sequencing Technology.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- PAGE-based transfer learning from single-cell to bulk sequencing enhances model generalization for sepsis diagnosis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Screening of prognostic core genes based on cell-cell interaction in the peripheral blood of patients with sepsis.Open life sciences · 2024Article
- The 'analysis of gene expression and biomarkers for point-of-care decision support in Sepsis' study; temporal clinical parameter analysis and validation of early diagnostic biomarker signatures for severe inflammation andsepsis-SIRS discrimination.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Leveraging transcriptomics for precision diagnosis: Lessons learned from cancer and sepsis.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Identification of two robust subclasses of sepsis with both prognostic and therapeutic values based on machine learning analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Single-cell transcriptome profiling of the immune space-time landscape reveals dendritic cell regulatory program in polymicrobial sepsis.Theranostics · 2022Article
- SysInflam HuDB, a Web Resource for Mining Human Blood Cells Transcriptomic Data Associated with Systemic Inflammatory Responses to Sepsis.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2021Article
- Multifaced roles of PLAC8 in cancer.Biomarker research · 2021Review
- Chronic Critical Illness Elicits a Unique Circulating Leukocyte Transcriptome in Sepsis Survivors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Development of a fixed module repertoire for the analysis and interpretation of blood transcriptome data.Nature communications · 2021Article
- A 29-mRNA host response test from blood accurately distinguishes bacterial and viral infections among emergency department patients.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2021Article
- Long non-coding RNA pairs to assist in diagnosing sepsis.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Comparison of machine-learning methodologies for accurate diagnosis of sepsis using microarray gene expression data.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn response to a need for better sepsis diagnostics, several new gene expression classifiers have been recently published, including the 11-gene "Sepsis MetaScore," the "FAIM3-to-PLAC8" ratio, and the Septicyte Lab. We performed a systematic search for publicly available gene expression data in sepsis and tested each gene expression classifier in all included datasets. We also created a public repository of sepsis gene expression data to encourage their future reuse. DATA SOURCES: We searched National Institutes of Health Gene Expression Omnibus and EBI ArrayExpress for human gene expression microarray datasets. We also included the Glue Grant trauma gene expression cohorts. STUDY SELECTION: We selected clinical, time-matched, whole blood studies of sepsis and acute infections as compared to healthy and/or noninfectious inflammation patients. We identified 39 datasets composed of 3,241 samples from 2,604 patients. DATA EXTRACTION: All data were renormalized from raw data, when available, using consistent methods. DATA SYNTHESIS: Mean validation areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for discriminating septic patients from patients with noninfectious inflammation for the Sepsis MetaScore, the FAIM3-to-PLAC8 ratio, and the Septicyte Lab were 0.82 (range, 0.73-0.89), 0.78 (range, 0.49-0.96), and 0.73 (range, 0.44-0.90), respectively. Paired-sample t tests of validation datasets showed no significant differences in area under the receiver operating characteristic curves. Mean validation area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for discriminating infected patients from healthy controls for the Sepsis MetaScore, FAIM3-to-PLAC8 ratio, and Septicyte Lab were 0.97 (range, 0.85-1.0), 0.94 (range, 0.65-1.0), and 0.71 (range, 0.24-1.0), respectively. There were few significant differences in any diagnostics due to pathogen type.
conclusionsThe three diagnostics do not show significant differences in overall ability to distinguish noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome from sepsis, though the performance in some datasets was low (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, < 0.7) for the FAIM3-to-PLAC8 ratio and Septicyte Lab. The Septicyte Lab also demonstrated significantly worse performance in discriminating infections as compared to healthy controls. Overall, public gene expression data are a useful tool for benchmarking gene expression diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.